FrancieBrady wrote: » The 'usual cohort' so. Imagine if it was a FG TD who had confessed to wrongdoing is all you need to here blanch. How did the last instance of that go?
olestoepoke wrote: » Unthinkable, especially the confidential state documents. Lets hope that if they do get into power they don't start using WhatsApp to share them.
IAMAMORON wrote: » You need someone that people respect on the public accounts committee. I simply could not respect Stanley going forward and he is the chairman? A total shambles. I am astonished this is still an issue, he should have gone yesterday.
blanch152 wrote: » Why do you think some people go to jail for forty years and others get the Probation Act? It depends on the seriousness of the wrongdoing. Varadkar isn't a sectarian racist like Stanley, calling a nation of people slow learners. It is vile.
Hamsterchops wrote: » Stanley really is a disgrace, he should be gone and he should be dismissed, and even though he's deleted his tweet, he thought it and he said it, and he owns it .. What a unpleasant person.
FrancieBrady wrote: » A high profile poster here thinks the PAC is a toothless, useless entity...no biggie who chairs it so....oh wait, they are DEMANDING he resign from the toothless useless entity.
IAMAMORON wrote: » By remaining on the PAC at this point he is simply undermining Matt Carthy and Imelda Munster. He is destroying their reputation also. He needs to go.
FrancieBrady wrote: » OMG he 'thought' it. We must stop that carry on immediately.
Hamsterchops wrote: » The thought it refers to the fact that he's deleted it, in other words he put it out there on Twitter. Then like a weasel that he is, he deleted it. Yes, he thought it would be a good tweet, but he was wrong. Shows very poor character.
IAMAMORON wrote: » Massively this. He hasn't even got the courage of his own conviction. Slimeball.
Hamsterchops wrote: » The thought it refers to the fact that he's deleted it, in other words he thought about it and put it out there on Twitter. Then like a weasel that he is, he deleted it. Yes, he thought it would be a good tweet, but he was wrong. Shows very poor character.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What makes you think that? He reconsidered the sensitivity of it.
Deleted User wrote: » Sinn Fein. The gift that keeps on giving. Mask has well and truly slipped.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » They haven't gone away you know.
Deleted User wrote: » Listening to a former British Soldier describing the scene they came upon after the 1979 attack was heartbreaking. He’d joined up with some of them and had to help pick pieces of their bodies out of trees.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Did you not realise the damage war and conflict can do?
Deleted User wrote: » Imagine if you were the “soldier” picking your IRA chums guts out of trees. Shur, that’d be no problem.
Hamsterchops wrote: » There you go again, I suspect you're actually a lot worse than Stanley, and you being only a 1st time SF voter :cool: You never miss a chance to snipe and to defend Sinn Fein and the IRA. Murder is murder, and Stanley knew what he was doing until somebody gave him a prod.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I was asking a reasonable question. had the poster never before considered the reality of war and conflict?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » I have to think Stanley has to go.