sydthebeat wrote: » anyway, apologies to simon if forward work is no longer under his remit... but i guess my point still stands, if not enhanced. Our general forward play has been pretty poor for the last 2 years
ionadnapokot wrote: » No more call ups? Weird
thomond2006 wrote: » That's it?! With the fourth game (Scotland) to come along with Europe, I'm stunned there hasn't been more additions. It's probably tricky to call up Munster players given they only played and flew back last night but still...
sydthebeat wrote: » https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/international/ireland-s-loss-set-up-by-shambolic-lineout-and-england-s-supreme-backrow-1.4415950 according to thornley hes not sure who runs the lineout..... why is it such a puzzle i wonder?
KBurke85 wrote: » Is it though there's over 30 players already in the squad
thomond2006 wrote: » I think you're better off giving Porter another go at TH. y
sydthebeat wrote: » id be backing kelleher for the start again here.... and earls to start if were going to have Lowe / Stu / Farrell across the back line. The georgian scrum hasnt been anywhere near as ferocious as was touted prior to the comp, so id like to see the dynamism of a dillane / henderson second row. EOS Kelleher Bealham Dillane Henderson Connors Stander VDF Murray Burns McCloskey Farrell Lowe Stockdale Earls Heffernan, Healy, Ryan, Roux, POM, Marmion, Byrne, Conway
CMcsporty wrote: » I don’t see the benefit of having Murray, Earls and Healy in a team to play Georgia Stockdale FB....I just hoped that would have been put out of it’s misery. & Then he finished that try beautifully against England! Unfortunately his fundamental unsuitable to the defensive requirements don’t appear to be an issue. It will be fine for Georgia...just like Italy but bloody hell It’s so naive if they persist. Why not bring Lowry in for Georgia?
thomond2006 wrote: » I think you're better off giving Porter another go at TH. Cian Healy has no business in the 23 and John Ryan can cover LH. Shane Daly should be getting a start somewhere in the back three, otherwise he'll have gone weeks with no rugby when Munster could have used him. Again, a 33 year old Earls shouldn't be involved in a game like this. EOS, Heffernan, Porter, Dillane, Henderson, Beirne, Connors, CJ; Marmion, Burns, Lowe, McCloskey, Farrell, Stockdale, Daly Kelleher, Bealham, Ryan, POM, Doris, JGP, Byrne, Conway
molloyjh wrote: » Porter has started every game since the 6Ns restart and just played a full 80 in Twickenham. He will not be in the 23. Good shout on Beirne though. He might start at 6 instead of POM, but more likely to bench I reckon. We are likely to go with a big TH lock in this one. Georgia offer very little in attack but are apparently no mugs in defence. England put a big score on them with a full strength side. We are not England and we will not be full strength. I think Roux will start with Hendo and then Hendo and Ryan next week. If Daly starts, I reckon he'll start on the wing. They are not giving up on Stockdale at FB and this is a perfect game to start him in there.
ionadnapokot wrote: » Or even play Daly!! This would have been my selection. Lowry; Lowe, Farrell, McCloskey, Stockdale; Byrne, JGP; EO'S, Kelleher, Porter; Baird, Ryan; Wycherly, PO'M, Dorris. Heffernan, Cronin?, Beahlam, Henderson, CJ, Casey, HByrne, Daly
CMcsporty wrote: » Yes they yet surprise us at FB! Surely it will be Daly. If anyone still thinks Stockdale is worth persevering at FB I think they are just been pig headed at this stage. A good run back at 11 is exactly what he needs. Georgia is the perfect game for him. I would be very interesting to see both him and Lowe on the wings. Porter will also probably be needed again for Georgia scrum. He reminds of Jack McGrath in his pomp in 2016 6N. 80mins v Wales then goes out to Paris 6 days later and plays 70mins+. He also started every game that 6N. No problem for Porter to go again.
ionadnapokot wrote: » Nariashvili would ate Beahlam!
Niallof9 wrote: » Fans wouldn't give a **** if we finished bottom.
P.Walnuts wrote: » I really really doubt this is true. Not much of a drop of scrummaging wise from Porter to Bealham at all.
aloooof wrote: » Given some of the hyperbole we see on here from time to time (and especially around international windows), I sincerely doubt this.
Niallof9 wrote: » Wow this is poor. well thats that from me, no time for Farrell. Its a no i think. Tarnished by the World Cup and hasn't put any stamp on this setup. Nice guy, good assistant coach but thats it. I think we'll get more the same in the Six Nations and that should be the end of the experiment. We need a proven, experienced head coach that realizes massive changes are needed. People would be tearing Eddie, Kidney and Joe asunder for not trying the odd wildcard. Its a ****ing freebie just try something else. Utterly daft. We literally have no window now to try different combinations. There's no pressure, no seeding, no crowds, no squad restraints. Fans wouldn't give a **** if we finished bottom. The fact that the development thing wasn't even used is awful. Why look at Baird before but not now, it makes no sense whatsoever much like this coaching group and their philosophy. Its utterly pointless having the big names in camp for this and in a normal Autumn window this wouldn't even be the case.