Hqrry113 wrote: » Again you need to educate yourself on what people mean when they say the British should leave. I'm sure you already know what it means but you're being purposefully ignorant.
downcow wrote: » Do you think Irish people should have left the USA, Canada and Australia? It’s a bit simplistic to say we should leave. And Britain didn’t want to hold on to it. Th truth is that the majority of residents of ni wanted to remain in Britain. Very different from India etc
downcow wrote: » That is maybe one of the big successes of ni. It didn’t chuck out the people who had been there for 400 years and some for 1,000 plus. Even though republicans in Roi would like them to have been chucked out
LuasSimon wrote: » The British left India and many other colonies why did they not leave Ireland altogether rather than still holding onto a quarter of it ?? We should have all stayed under british rule or had a United ireland not the fudge it ended up .
RobMc59 wrote: » Caught you out dead to rights so squirm and insult as much as you like, its plain for all to see by your refusal to answer a simple question.
BonnieSituation wrote: » If you weren't such a disingenuous poster you'd be funny.
BonnieSituation wrote: » Oh look, it's the guy who justified Bloody Sunday in Derry. Sham.
RobMc59 wrote: » You need to change the record bonnie,you`re still churning out the same verbal diarrhea from last year-do you condemn all killings that happened that day?
BonnieSituation wrote: » We can add geography, and history to the economy another examples of failure in the last century I guess. The engagement on this matter has been disgraceful. After certain posters didn't condemn the killing at a football match of innocent match goers and indeed a player, that should have been the end of the discussion. There's no point Francie. Don't bother.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What has that got to do with anything?
vriesmays wrote: » Northern Ireland don't have Stephen Kenny for their football manager.
jh79 wrote: » Was his church part of a wider organisation? It was my impression he was the self appointed leader of an organisation he created.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What's a 'real' church? His 'church building' here in County Monaghan was as real as the RC or COI one. As were the ones across the north.
jh79 wrote: » Was it a real church though or similar to his "PhD"? I wouldn't know much about the religion but can't anyone become a pastor and therefore a "church leader"?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Was Ian not a 'church leader' then?
downcow wrote: » Something else that it suits people to distort. At its peak the Free Presbyterian C of Ulster had less than 0.5% of the population as members. You would think they way it is often reported that it was somehow A major denomination
downcow wrote: » Francie is correct and the UN have made a mistake drawing the international borders ��
jm08 wrote: » Adams didn't have a pulpit. He was banned from the airwaves up to the 1990s, so no, he couldn't have been preaching hate.
downcow wrote: » I was responding to his direct question. Paisley like Adams was relevant in Northern Ireland due to his involvement in politics and potentially other dodgy stuff. They were both practised their religions but neither were very relevant or had many followers religiously
Necro wrote: » Gerry Adams was a priest now? Not a fair comparison to the Reverend Paisley tbh.
FrancieBrady wrote: » None of The Cairo Gang were from your 'wee country' downcow.