Paul Smeenus wrote: » Under Les Kiss, you'd have gotten an Ulster try-out.
molloyjh wrote: » So that people can only play in the country of their birth or where they have ancestry? What about people who move to a country as kids and come through the system in that country? Many Tuilagi for example was born in Samoa and has no English ancestry (to my knowledge at least) but he moved to England and came through their set up. He qualified on residency grounds. So how do you account for those cases? Do you say that anyone who started professional rugby in other countries are excluded?
A documentary produced by Pacific Rugby Welfare Dan Leo investigating the state of rugby in Samoa, Tonga and Fiji has evoked an enormous reaction online and inspired a call for change in how the game is governed by World Rugby. Oceans Apart: Greed, Betrayal and Pacific Rugby – a production that was three years in the making – takes aim at World Rugby, highlighting the injustices that exist in the game and the exploitation of Pacific Island players. It also exposed the scandals and corruption that officials in Fiji, Samoa and Tonga have been involved in.
ionadnapokot wrote: » This is how I would rate Irelands FB options Obvs Keenan & Stockdale are ahead of Lowry selection wise. I just rate Lowry higher. 1. Larmour 2. Lowry 3. Keenan 4. Daly 5. Jimmy O'B 6. Stephen Fitgerald 7. Stockdale 8. Addsion* Discounting Addison really because of his injury profile. edit ive not seen any of Matt Gallagher
kingofthekong wrote: » Lowry has some great skills but his height is gonna hurt him in the coaches eyes when contesting ball in the air , also Daly had some good performances but nothing like what JOB has done recently , JOB has shown a quality kicking game and grubbered balls for tries, cleaned up some very slippery situations and his ability to create opportunities for others is very good - he’s a better player than Daly imo
Niallof9 wrote: » . If there's no room for outstanding runners like him in Irish rugby we might as well give it all up.
Niallof9 wrote: » Michael Lowry is the same height as Cheslin Kolbe. He needs to bulk up a wee bit but his height should never be an issue. Anyway his future is probably at 10. If there's no room for outstanding runners like him in Irish rugby we might as well give it all up.
thomond2006 wrote: » The likes of JOB and Craig Casey need to prove themselves in games where their team isn't utterly dominant around them. Until then, I'd pull the brakes on Ireland talk, or at least Ireland talk for games against 6N teams at Ireland's level.
kingofthekong wrote: » Yes but Cheslin Kolbe adds a lot more then Lowry does, what Cheslin Kolbe lacks for in height he brings a ridiculous attacking threat and power in the tackle, If Lowry can grow and replicate that level of ability then his height wont matter but thats a big ask, not impossible but very difficult to reach a Kolbe level of attacking threat, What i think he has in his favour over Kolbe is a better kicking game which is good
ionadnapokot wrote: » In some coaches eyes yes From what ive seen of him he has an excellent leap and good hands in the air. Negates his height somewhat. Also extremely brave in the air and tackle. When you take that into account along with his counter attack and kicking skills i feel he is the one Ulster and Ireland should be investing game time in at FB. Not Stockdale. Lowry only 22. JOB has looked vgood recently. At almost 24 he hasn't really played many high pressure games. Not sure he going to play FB ahead of both Larmour and Keenan at Leinster He looks promising along with Daly - Will he start ahead of Haley at Munster? edit: i think he should because Daly looks solid and made for FB. Seen Haley make to many error's at critical points in the past re: Fitzgerald...i know! i put him in because i like him. Its clear Ireland have many options ahead of him & so do Connacht
ionadnapokot wrote: » Kolbe is a freak McKenzie is the player Lowry can realistically aspire to becomehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ltm0k-lnv2s
Niallof9 wrote: » Kolbe is 27 and it took him a while to get there. Lowry is what 22? And like i said he'll probably end up at ten. We need to start trusting outstanding runners in this country. Being 5,7 doesn't matter a jot.
kingofthekong wrote: » Good point forgot about mckenzie, Mckenzie is a very powerful guy for his size though and a very strong tackler
ionadnapokot wrote: » Here is his debut v Argentina. He was just 21. I think he played most of his games at 10 for Chiefs that season Comes on and plays FB you can see how raw he is defensively but NZ clearly were willing to invest time on a young special talent.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yUiN3y3ymo I believe Lowry and Larmour are Irelands unique talents that should be afforded as much time as possible at provincial level to grow into that FB role. Why cant Farrell select Lowry for Georgia? Even at No.23 I fail to see what negatives outweigh the positives.
bilston wrote: » He might select Lowry for Georgia as I expect he will add a few players. But he has never been in a training camp, plus you'd expect Daly will start at 15. Although with Sexton injured there is an advantage to having Lowry on the bench. But I think it would be very hard for him to come into camp for the first time 5 days before a match so I think it's unlikely. The concern for me with Lowry is that Farrell and Catt just take the view he is too small and don't even give him a chance. That would be a mistake IMO. He might find the step up too much physically, but he might also be the electric impact player Ireland need. But he should get a chance. I don't know where (if anywhere) we tour next summer, but with the Lions, it seems a good chance for players like Lowry to get their shot.
Paul Smeenus wrote: » He's got a good tackle technique and good positional sense. His dive on the ball at our line against Zebre was smart, decisive and ballsy. He's not going to flatten many in the tackle (apart from Nakawara - https://twitter.com/Murray_Kinsella/status/1084933001698594817?s=20 ) but he's not a liability in any way. I was initially pretty sanguine about him being too small, but his upside is massive, and I haven't seen any actual real - rather than presumed - defensive weakness due to his size.
Clegg wrote: » I think if a player is good enough it doesn't really matter if they haven't played against top level opposition yet. Hugo Keenan had only started Pro 14 games against middling opposition before being thrown into Leinster's knockout games in Europe and the league. And off a very small sample of games he was thrown into the Ireland starting side. Hasn't looked out of place at any level.