Kamu wrote: » Looking at instagram it seems to have been a mix of everything: Onlyfans, revenge porn, underage girls, girls not knowing that they were being filmed.
Gradius wrote: » Isn't that onlyfans thing like a soft porn website, essentially? All this social media guff teaches boys/men to treat women as objects and become walking wallets, while it teaches girls/women to treat men as ATM's and to become objects. It simply must be psychologically damaging. Like all that influencer shoite, a growing pile of people being taught to have zero utility in life, gurn at a screen and get money for such low efforts. What a pitiful waste of life, genuinely sad
Gradius wrote: » Isn't that onlyfans thing like a soft porn website, essentially?/
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Eh, never on it, but it's hardcore, hardest of the hard, no regulation. It is what ever each person wants it, and some are twisted as fck.
Bubblesxoxx wrote: » we have stage names in work to protect our identity
paleoperson wrote: » No, it's hardcore pornography for people who pay. If someone sets up an only fans it 99%+ of the time means they are offering hardcore pornography.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Well the original concept is still there, there are 1000's of people on there doing Yoga, Cooking, Exercise, Singing, Art, Woodwork, Travel Vlogs, General Vlogging, ect ... you name it, all nothing to do with porn whatsoever.
Quantum Erasure wrote: » It should be banned, can you imagine the debates in the Dail though...
paleoperson wrote: » That may be true, but to put it into perspective most people there doing yoga, cooking, exercise, singing etc. are doing it as a backdrop to hardcore pornography.
Eric Cartman wrote: » just upset people are getting them for free really. Its a dangerous path were going down teaching young girls to sell themselves on the internet.
Larsso30 wrote: » I don't understand all this �� did they hack Of site? How was there underage images? Were they people underage on OF?
bigpink wrote: » So the Irish Porn stars are pissed off their photos are going round the internet?
Junkyard Tom wrote: » It sounds as if it's a combination of the two, both adult nude images from a subscriber-only site and personal images shared with former partners by women and underage girls.
robinbird wrote: » Yes. Exactly.. But now they have got all the political parties involved and the Gardai are tracking down and will be prosecuting those that looked at their private porn for free. Politicians and newspapers all on board with the outrage.
bigpink wrote: » I don't get their out rage they posted the pics what they expect The underage thing is sick however
bigpink wrote: » Oh I think the underage thing is guys posting ex underage girlfriends i.e teens or pics from there social media Under 18 illegal but thinks it all teen stuff not kids Shows the danger of posting pics and the potential to be shared
AndrewJRenko wrote: » Classy approach to child pornographyhttps://twitter.com/taiggoth/status/1329153252588457984?s=19
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » I see she deleted a tweet '' sub to my onlyfans'' see here is a kid distributing CP on onlyfans, and her only problem is the leak and loss of earnings? She needs a visit from Garda herself in all fairness. And then she comes out with ## I only sent it to my BF''
Large Cappuccino wrote: » Women have since the dawn of time traded sex. It is quite common for wives all over the world to use sex to gain control over their husbands.
SusieBlue wrote: » If he gets done for child porn his life will be ruined, no question
Quantum Erasure wrote: » It should be banned, .