Eric Cartman wrote: » just upset people are getting them for free really. Its a dangerous path were going down teaching young girls to sell themselves on the internet.
paleoperson wrote: » That may be true, but to put it into perspective most people there doing yoga, cooking, exercise, singing etc. are doing it as a backdrop to hardcore pornography.
Quantum Erasure wrote: » It should be banned, can you imagine the debates in the Dail though...
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Well the original concept is still there, there are 1000's of people on there doing Yoga, Cooking, Exercise, Singing, Art, Woodwork, Travel Vlogs, General Vlogging, ect ... you name it, all nothing to do with porn whatsoever.
paleoperson wrote: » No, it's hardcore pornography for people who pay. If someone sets up an only fans it 99%+ of the time means they are offering hardcore pornography.
Bubblesxoxx wrote: » we have stage names in work to protect our identity
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Eh, never on it, but it's hardcore, hardest of the hard, no regulation. It is what ever each person wants it, and some are twisted as fck.
Gradius wrote: » Isn't that onlyfans thing like a soft porn website, essentially?/
Gradius wrote: » Isn't that onlyfans thing like a soft porn website, essentially? All this social media guff teaches boys/men to treat women as objects and become walking wallets, while it teaches girls/women to treat men as ATM's and to become objects. It simply must be psychologically damaging. Like all that influencer shoite, a growing pile of people being taught to have zero utility in life, gurn at a screen and get money for such low efforts. What a pitiful waste of life, genuinely sad
Kamu wrote: » Looking at instagram it seems to have been a mix of everything: Onlyfans, revenge porn, underage girls, girls not knowing that they were being filmed.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Onlyfans seems to take no responsibility for any 12-17 year olds on there with fake ID'S The whole concept is flawed, and so easy for them to say '' oh well'' ,
Kamu wrote: » Deservedly so.
bigpink wrote: » I must have gotten this wrong I thought it was Irish sex/porn stars I'm sorry I don't realise it ws child porn
SusieBlue wrote: » If he gets done for child porn his life will be ruined, no question
Kamu wrote: » Sounds pretty serious, also what an idiot. If charges are pressed (can gardai press charges knowing that some of the photos were of underaged girls or does one of the actual girls have to press charge?) will get done for child porn, that is any form of life he may of had over.
capefear wrote: » https://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/article/how-does-onlyfans-work I know not all will make this but 800k a month, it was mentioned before that some Irish girls are making 7.5k - 10 a month
SusieBlue wrote: » Some guy who shared over 6 thousand nudes of both private pics and Only Fans content on an online discord server accidentally uploaded a screenshot of his college end of year results, including his full name, address and college course, among the photos. Some of the girls in the pictures were not only under 18, they were also unaware they were being photographed/recorded which makes it even worse. It will be classed as child porn should charges be pressed.