The details for the services are as follows: Randox - (Walk-through service) PCR test €99 with results within 24 hours. Randox’s walk-through facility will be located in an existing building close to the Terminal 2 multi-storey car park and will have separate entry and exit points for customers. RocDoc - (Drive-through service) PCR test €129 with results in 24-48 hours, LAMP test €149 with results in 12 hours, and LAMP test express €159 with results in 5 hours. RocDoc’s drive-through facility will be located in the Express Green car park, which is accessed via the R132 (Old Airport Road).
1123heavy wrote: » The government argued in court that quarantine was only advisory. Why would you bother paying for this to avoid a quarantine you don't even need to do??
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » They can apperently do 12k tests a day, at €99 a go do they use gold to test for the virus? Where is the cost coming from?
Tenger wrote: » The lab facilities, technicians and reagents required to analyse the sample. It's not a pregnancy test from Boots.
1123heavy wrote: » Why would you bother paying for this to avoid a quarantine you don't even need to do??
Thierry12 wrote: » Ridiculous Mandatory rapid tests at the gates for €5 each would catch way more cases A compliance excercise is all this is. Joke
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » They can apparently do 12k tests a day, at €99 a go do they use gold to test for the virus? Where is the cost coming from?
bk wrote: » People who might be visiting elderly parents/grandparents over Christmas who might like not to kill them!
bk wrote: » The reason is, lets say you are exposed to the virus on the flight, and you get the test at the airport straight after arriving, the test would come back negative, but you could still have Covid19 and become infectious a few days later. It can take 5 days or so after you are exposed to the virus, before a PCR test can detect it in you. Worth clarifying how this works so folks understand what is involved.
VivaLasBegas wrote: » While this may be true in terms of the germination period what utter nonsense. If that's the recommendation for travel it should apply for going to the supermarket or any other time you leave home. Absolute drivel. We are living in a nation in hysterics over this virus.
VivaLasBegas wrote: » While this may be true in terms of the germination period what utter nonsense. If that's the recommendation for travel it should apply for going to the supermarket or any other time you leave home.
Absolute drivel. We are living in a nation in hysterics over this virus.
bk wrote: » No drivel! Just factual information on how testing works. Last time I went to a supermarket, I didn't sit shoulder to shoulder with other people for multiple hours in a small cylinder with recycled air. Clearly a supermarket and aircraft aren't the same level of risk. Add to that all the other contact points involved with flying, bus/taxi to/from the airport, checkin desk, security queue, busy terminal, boarding queue, etc. Plus you can avoid the supermarket too, I've been doing online delivery for years, it is great. This is all about limiting the risk to yourself and if visiting high risk family and friends over Christmas as many people will, limiting the risk to them too.
beachhead wrote: » has anyone here considered the havoc a flu outbreak could cause this winter.There is more happening than covid19
VivaLasBegas wrote: » https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/flying-covid-19-harvard-study-wellness/index.html Sure what would Harvard know! Think if all the items on supermarket shelves and then think of who was touching them before you did?? How often do we pick items up and put them back. It is just as much a risk.
t was funded by airlines, airplane manufacturers and airports, but the Harvard researchers insist this did not impact their findings.
bk wrote: » ROFLOL, here I have a bridge to sell you. We know for a fact that there have been outbreaks on aircraft, the article you linked to mentions one reported right here in Ireland. Far too many people on flights, eating/drinking and not wearing masks or not wearing them properly. Of course NPHET's major concern is less catching it on the plane and more about important new mutated strains from abroad. The version of Covid19 currently circulating in Ireland (60% of cases) is a mutation that developed in Spain and was brought back by holiday makers.
L1011 wrote: » The 99 is Randox, RocDoc always said 149+
TRANQUILLO wrote: » anyone know if we can claim tax relief on these tests? Medical fees etc I'll need them every month id say , sometimes twice a month .
goingnowhere wrote: » Nope, you can only claim if it was a treatment prescribed by a doctor. COVID testing is free if you meet the clinical case definition. Obviously your employer should be paying for testing if it is a critical business need. If we all pull together and get the numbers down we might be a green country and could halve the testing need for travel
bk wrote: » Covid19 + a flu outbreak would be the nightmare scenario. That is why they are encouraging everyone to get the flu vaccine this year and why it is free for everyone this year (normally it isn't)..
TRANQUILLO wrote: » Im my employer. its a business expense as far as i can see. i don't want the test or need the test. they are making me take the test. Im done with trying to get the numbers down. The numbers mean nothing.