Black_Knight wrote: » From the ievoa virtual meeting: Eamonn stack from range therapy: All related to the leaf. - Adding 120km range to a leaf for about €7k. Adding an additional battery into the boot in a fireproof box. Takes a lot from gen 1 boots, but only 18cm from the boot of gen 2 boots. - If you provided the battery pack, a swap would be 1200-2500 depending on battery size. Taking from muxan and bringing it to Ireland. - CCS conversion and 3 phase conversion available, but expensive. CCS conversion (in a Zoe for example) could be 1-2k. On the face of it, I find it hard to see people willing to put 6-7k into a 6-8 year old car. Ok you get a few k for your own battery pack, but it's a lot of money and I'd wonder is that 6-7k better served in a new car?
unkel wrote: » Price of the install of the 18kWh boot pack. Supply and fit, including VAT: Muxsan (Netherlands): €5990 Cleevely Electric Vehicles (UK) as per the James & Kate video: £6250 (€6955) RangeTherapy (Ireland): €7500 Now I appreciate the pack would cost a couple hundred quid to ship to here, but that is a very significant price difference
Black_Knight wrote: » Do they quote 7500 in range therapy? On the meeting they said 6-7k. And keep reiterating they don't do it for profit.
How much does this cost? +120km (18kWh) extension pack costs €7500. This includes: Muxsan kit, extension battery pack, installation and warranty (VAT included)
Vehicle modification in Ireland and UK is classified as any work done that is listed in the “Permanent Fixture Item” list. An EV battery extension is not on the list. Therefore, it is not viewed as a formal modification, just an enhancement, like installing a very expensive stereo.
As this is not a formal vehicle modification, there are no insurance implications. Your car is clearly more valuable with the pack. However, in the unlikely case of a car write-off, the insurance company are unlikely to pay extra.
Kramer wrote: » What's a "formal modification"? :rolleyes:.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » Breaking News: A huge German Manufacturer is selling lots more EV's compared to an American premium EV manufacturer, who's cars are more expensive than the German makers cars are.... making decent EV's more affordable for a lot more people. Anybody who didn't think this was going to happen would be a fool's fool.
cruisey1987 wrote: » Interesting article about Tesla vs VW ID sales in Norway and the Netherlandshttps://www.forbes.com/sites/jimcollins/2020/11/17/volkswagen-has-sold-359x-as-many-id3s-as-tesla-has-sold-model-3s-in-the-netherlands-in-november-and-112x-as-many-in-norway/?sh=ebbb2c576844 Short summary, there's a lot more ID.3s being sold than model 3s. The writer is a known Tesla critic, so I'm not sure I buy the whole 'Tesla is doomed' spiel, and there's a lot more behind the numbers. VW had a huge stockpile of ID.3s built up while Tesla have been having production issues due to Covid-19, so there's not a huge benefit in comparing numbers at the moment. I'd say the 2021 numbers will make for very interesting reading It does show raise some interesting questions though. Is Tesla starting to hit the end of the Model 3 rush and are potential customers waiting for a price drop or a Model 3 refresh, or waiting for the Model Y It also means Tesla will have fewer ZEV credits to sell, which will hurt their profits. Anyway, let the arguing commence
Cyrus wrote: » the norwegians are loaded generally so once decent german options came available that was always going to happen, for a period the e-tron was the best selling car in norway :eek:
cruisey1987 wrote: » There's definitely a bit of a love affair between Norwegians and German cars, but I guess you could say the same for the rest of Europe.
AndyBoBandy wrote: » Musk has repeatedly said he wants this (more big manufacturers making EV's), that's why most of the Tesla patents are out there and open for anyone to see and use* As much as he wants Tesla to succeed (and they are succeeding), he also wants the world driving EV's, and he's not stupid enough to think only Tesla can or should do it. He wants the likes of VW doing mass market EV's... Tesla has and will continue have it's place in the market, just like the Koreans will, as well as the Germans, Chinese et all. *not entirely how sure I am on this, but I do believe they share their designs/IP for other manufacturers to use (should they want to).
MJohnston wrote: » That would only be a problem for Tesla if they wanted to be a car manufacturer. But what they want to be more is a clean energy tech company. The car business is just a niche product that's intended to drive uptake and demand on the energy side of things.
cruisey1987 wrote: » Tbh Tesla seem to be aiming to be a battery company and everything else is just a sideline to sell batteries
garo wrote: » Really? What do you base that on?
cruisey1987 wrote: » Battery day, lack of announcements about new cars to name two There was a tweet about a Model 2 but that sounds more reactive to the fact that there's a lot of budget EVs coming out now (budget compared to Model 3 that is)
unkel wrote: » Why would they announce any new cars? The company hasn't the size. The current factories (just opened or still being built) will almost exclusively produce Model 3 and Model Y Personally I can't ever see Tesla doing a budget small hatch like a Model 2. And if they will, it's many years away. Maybe once / if / when they build a million of the above per year
slave1 wrote: » Don't forget their Superchargning network, it's a serious competitive advantage they have
cruisey1987 wrote: » If you think about what makes Telsa great, it comes down to: Batteries Efficiency Autopilot Tech gizmos
AndyBoBandy wrote: » And don't forget Performance...... I drive a lowly SR+, Tesla's slowest current car at around 360HP, 0-100 in just the 5.6 seconds..