ZENER wrote: » My first car was a 1984 Polo hatchback. Wouldn't start on a cold morning but I could tear down the dizzy and put it back together in 20 minutes. Loved it for the 5 years I owned it. Ken
JabbaTheHut wrote: » I don't follow how that makes a difference.
Andrew33 wrote: » That argument has been done to death. Drop it.
Garzard wrote: » What would be the usual things to watch out for in one of these, buying them nowadays?
JabbaTheHut wrote: » I asked a simple question. Yours is not helpful. And please show some respect.
Andrew33 wrote: » Wasn’t being disrespectful, accept my apologies if you misinterpreted my response. It’s been debated to death and generally accepted that a D plated car generally holds a little bit more value than any other county plate. Doesn’t really mean anything after the first 6-18 months of ownership.
JabbaTheHut wrote: » That's no problem. And thanks for giving the explaination for the D plate. I've heard about the value of the plate on everyday cars, but wasn't aware that it affected classics too. If it's been done to death, I'll leave it there so.
Andrew33 wrote: » Thank you for your graciousness. I can be a little bit blunt at times with my response.
Duke O Smiley wrote: » Thats Deane Motors
woejus wrote: » yes, that's why I blurred out the reg. lots of nice stuff up and down the laneway - that 635, a G-wagen, a Scimitar deathtrap, a big old Silver Shadow, a lovely E28.
Duke O Smiley wrote: » I wonder if that little Austin/Morris 1100 further up the lane belongs to them. Always seems to be sitting there
Tzardine wrote: » I dont get the logic behind blurring the reg?
woejus wrote: » I'm alright with taking pictures of interesting classics where it's clear the owner is driving it or has parked it up. You can see from my history here that's all I post. Some of the cars I post up are mine at any rate. However as I think it is probably a new import for Simon I didn't want the reg coming up and people looking it up etc, doing checks on it before he puts it up for sale. Probably the same reason "U Found Me" and the other lad selling the 230TE mentioned elsewhere obscure the reg of cars they sell. It's a H reg so 1989? Near mint condition as most of the stuff they bring in is. I think the hysteria of blanking out every poxy reg plate is stupid though, if you don't have access to the system all you can really do is see if it's taxed, and if the badge matches the engine size etc. Broadsheet are particularly anal about this, pointless.
Duke O Smiley wrote: » London today, within meters of one another. The Saab is a daily driver
SmartinMartin wrote: » Shoulda bought Duke's 99 2 years ago. Kicks self.
unkel wrote: » 96? Yeah that was a steal. How much you sell for Duke? Was also matte colour, but for different reasons