Yeah_Right wrote: » How come some of the overseas born players don't have an AIL club mentioned and some do? I remember reading an article about Lowe joining some lower tier club in "non-traditional" rugby neighbourhood in Dublin. I think it was Clondalkin. Why wouldn't that club be next to his name? I know its a trivial thing.
Squidgy Black wrote: » Could be wrong but I think it could be a case that he's not a registered player with Clondalkin but just affiliated with the clubs. Clondalkin wouldn't be AIL either they're a junior club.
The Lost Sheep wrote: » They never will have affiliated with any club. Wouldnt have been a reason for them. When not qualified for Ireland they would never have been able to play in the AIL and after that they just never joined with a club. Shame some players arent listed as their home clubs especially guys that will never be seen playing club rugby bar the unlikiest of circumstances. Like Tadhg Furlong with New Ross, Like its great to see Stockdale with Lurgan who are a junior division 2 club
Yeah_Right wrote: » I agree. I think it would be great if some of the big name players were affiliated with the smaller, lesser known clubs. Even if the only interaction is going be showing up at kids games for photos and autographs or presenting a few prizes. It was always a big buzz back home when an All Black or PI international would show up at the club on Saturday especially if they were actually putting the boots on. Admittedly that was very rare and was only if they were coming back from an injury. It would be good if more of the overseas born players did what Lowe did and aligned themselves with a junior club. BTW, what is a junior club?
irishbucsfan wrote: » Fairly sure the IRFU won't list junior clubs for whatever reason. Might be dodgy memory, but I remember Jamie Heaslip wanted to list Naas back when they were out of the AIL and couldn't, then when they got back into AIL 3 I think he switched back from DU.
Paul Smeenus wrote: » https://www.the42.ie/ireland-captain-the42-rugby-weekly-5264455-Nov2020/ "Whose fault is it Johnny isn't a great captain? Crucially, it's someone else's." Cheap jibes aside, I don't know how much of a leadership group he actually does have around him. Especially in a team like tomorrow's with so many players with so few caps. Having said that, I don't know who Best would have had that Sexton doesn't. Kearney, maybe? Henderson being back will help.
shootermacg wrote: » I don't think Sexton made any bad decisions in the France game. I agreed with his decision to go for the 5M lineout after all we were there to win it and part of that is backing yourself. Unfortunately when you have journalists that get paid to make players' lives a misery, it doesn't help when someone does anything at all to stand out. Sexton's mistake was not accepting being sent off with a deadpan face. It's tough on Irish rugby players these days, trying to make the court of fools that is Irish journalism (and the more vocal fans) happy. You have the likes of Off the Ball and Franno etc getting paid to act like arsehats.
Paul Smeenus wrote: » Well, the whole point of this article is to deflect criticism from him, so I think you're a bit off-base. "I think there is a question mark around the leadership group in this Irish team and that’s not just Johnny. Everyone looks at Johnny but the days of the captain being all-encompassing and running everything are gone." “Since then, in the big games like England away and France away, when things have gone amiss a bit, it seems like Johnny is the only one everyone is looking to. That’s tough on him, particularly the way Ireland play and so much going through him. That’s difficult." He's hardly being hung out to dry.
shootermacg wrote: » “The interesting one is Eddie Jones. If you look at England when they play, at half-time before the players go into the dressing room, they have a little huddle on the field, they have various leaders in different areas of the game – not just Owen Farrell – speak and give feedback around how it has gone." I couldn't help but think of the Benny Hill show that was Connor O'Shea's Italy making mugs of the English brains trust.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Sometimes one leader is too dominant and it stifles other potential leaders from growing and developing into the lieutenants a team needs. Johnny always comes across as “narky” it’s one of the terms frequently used to describe his attitude. Narky isn’t a good thing and a narky leader creates a terrible atmosphere. It’s the kind of atmosphere that might make people perform well in some ways but it doesn’t promote growth. It doesn’t promote new ideas because they’re short down and it doesn’t promote challenge to the narky leader. I predict that as soon as Sexton retires, there will be a general attitude that he was good in some ways but his narky, authoritarian leadership style actually held them back in other ways
kingofthekong wrote: » Sexton is a competitor to the 9th degree, the man wants to win with every fibre of his being, to be honest I love his attitude in many ways however sometimes it shows its self in undesirable ways like when he got subbed, but it shows you the pure passion he has to win at this level and I think that’s so important to have in the squad. Sometimes his outbursts are a bit ridiculous but I also find that when players don’t show enough passion and fight in the jersey that’s equally off putting and frustrating to watch. Now he may well be an authoritarian “narky” leader behind the scenes.. but that is all just total speculation as no one really has a clue how good or bad he is as a leader behind the scenes and how the lads perceive him. By all accounts “again more speculation” Farrell is a great leader behind the scenes at sarries and England and how many questionable scenes have you seen from him on a pitch.....from taking opposing academy outhalfs heads off, fighting and mouthing off with other players etc etc Sexton acts out sometimes in the pitch and rightfully gets stick for it but assuming he’s a bad leader because of it I think is off the mark.
lawrencesummers wrote: » It’s entirely possible that the three most influential players in this Irish team for the next two years will all be foreign born qualified through residency. Stander Aki LoweSay whatever you like about it, agree with it or not I don’t care, the soccer is the same but at least these three players have firmly put their roots down here. I’m fine with it but at the same time I think it devalues international rugby a little. Personally I think there should be a limit on the number of residency qualified players in a match day 23.
lawrencesummers wrote: » It’s entirely possible that the three most influential players in this Irish team for the next two years will all be foreign born qualified through residency. Stander Aki Lowe Say whatever you like about it, agree with it or not I don’t care, the soccer is the same but at least these three players have firmly put their roots down here. I’m fine with it but at the same time I think it devalues international rugby a little. Personally I think there should be a limit on the number of residency qualified players in a match day 23.
lawrencesummers wrote: » It’s entirely possible that the three most influential players in this Irish team for the next two years will all be foreign born qualified through residency.
lawrencesummers wrote: » Personally I think there should be a limit on the number of residency qualified players in a match day 23.
bilston wrote: » Players either qualify or they don't. There is no grey area here.
phog wrote: » Digital Match Program available online
salmocab wrote: » Yeah and it could get greyer. Someone like Adeloukon technically qualified on residency as far as I remember and I doubt many would want to treat him in the same way as the lads who came to just play rugby.
pickarooney wrote: » Where is Niyi these days?