Jim2007 wrote: » If they were priced so efficiently why would they fall? After all according to you every scenario has been priced in? The reality is that the EMH is just a theory and stock prices are highly speculative in the short run. No it won't, most of the speculators could not take a set accounts apart if their lives depended on it. It's just group think, nothing more. That is why we have wirecard, worldcom, enron etc... and that is why people will continue to have such losses. In every case the signs were there, the questions were being asked, but ignored or brushed aside by analysts and speculators who failed to do their homework.
Jim2007 wrote: » So what? It was part of a regular exercise, it happens all the time. And it will be fully reviewed. Over twenty five years ago myself and four others holding senior positions at a certain US multinational happened to sell our positions at the very highest price the share has ever hit (even today). And it took the SEC investigators nearly three months to sign off on it. It's never a good idea to hold most of your portfolio in the company you work for so selling of positions is a regular event.
Limpy wrote: » https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/11/11/investing/pfizer-ceo-albert-bourla-stock-sale-vaccine/index.html
sirboby wrote: » Wait, are you for or against active investing? I agree that there are always discrepancies that we can take advantage of but I thought from your earlier posts you had more of a passive investing mindset.
Jim2007 wrote: » If they were priced so efficiently why would they fall? After all according to you every scenario has been priced in? The reality is that the EMH is just a theory and stock prices are highly speculative in the short run.
Treppen wrote: » Ncyt up again. Think it was a bit of a shake down.
DilD wrote: » Stocks are forward looking, they price in any possible scenario in advance, that's why stocks often fall on good earnings.
DilD wrote: » For me, that's why I follow price action and not just fundamentals. If a stock is running into trouble, price will tell you well before the fundamentals will.
dashcamdanny wrote: » Aurora ACB might be a bit of a steal right now. They are planning something i rekon, yet to be announced later this week.
dashcamdanny wrote: » regardless. its gone up 2 bucks from $6 to $8 since I posted that earlier . If it breaks 8.30 this evening, i think it may rocket. Peltz. Resigned years ago from Aurora. Miguel Martin , is leading them into a new era. A very accomplished manager. Aurora are the biggest giant in the industry.
Scuid Mhór wrote: » ... It's only going up from here in the long term.
RIGOLO wrote: » Held off on PLTR yesterday , market was still settling after Biontech monday and I took heed from Jim Cramer.But have reassessed and am going for it. I dont regret any missed losses due to this delay, again its good to practice various habits of trading . Market seems to be swinging back in favour of tech and software, lets see if it holds another day. CRSR profit I hardly knew you , your back in the game , on PLTR.Noobs I do not recommend you jump right into swing trading and do this type of stuff. Maybe as Im one of those old distinguished white dudes the world has come to despise I need to create my own excitment in my life. There is an awful lot to be said for holding and investing long term, Ive plenty already tied up in that. For now me personally I think the VIX is screaming that swing trading will give returns. And I checked that no biotech has an earnings call in the next 24 hours, Id be surprised if any did release news given the market couldnt absorb more, so we have a window where no magic vaccine other than Putins Potion is going to be announced.
Cpfm wrote: » I bought into DDOG last month, now I'm down almost 16% after posting great q3 results..don't understand that tbh. noob problem I guess.
Curious Geroge wrote: » Any thoughts on DataDog DDOG - seems to have suffered the fate of many companies, a bad day following good results.
DutchYurt wrote: » I can not express enough how much you should stay away from that company, there has been a partnership or peltz to score a deal or something up their sleeve for about 3 years now. Their management team are idiots. They upgraded their revenue targets by 12% or something along those lines a week before earnings then missed them? WHO does that. Then the CFO announced they wouldn't turn a profit until 2021. There are much better weed companies. I'm just a stranger on the internet but I will always call that company out for the sack of **** it is. The only thing keep it afloat after the reverse split is yolo robinhood traders.
PHG wrote: » Just buy the FT Weekender, will give the highlights for the week
riddles wrote: » Is a subscription to the FT a valuable information source or is there a decent recommended alternative thx
Nemeses2050 wrote: » CRSR blows away estimates and still down