awsah wrote: » it came up again in aug 2019. I'm worried that as this is the 4th EU paper this year that anything is liable to come up!!
Fe1user5555 wrote: » Sorry I’m so out of the loop! which question was it I can’t pick it out?
Fe1user5555 wrote: » Thanks so much!! Just regarding preliminary reference procedure my grid says it hasn’t been up since 2014 are you doing it in conjunction with a different topic? Sorry I just hadn’t planned on looking at it
Fe1user5555 wrote: » I’m studying it within an institutions q but hadn’t planned on focusing on it as a whole topic sorry for all the q’s!
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » I've actually decided to cut PRP now, not worth it in the time I have left. But yeah I meant it by itself. I'm also cutting Citizenship. Too nebulous.
church street 94 wrote: » Contract Which of the following, if any, would be safe to leave out ? Privity, mistake or terms Doing: O+A Intention Consideration/prom estoppel Consumer protection UI Misrepresentation Discharge Remedies
bobbinn wrote: » No idea, sorry. I'm wondering whether UNDUE INFLUENCE appeared recently? I had a nice eq prepared on it for equity before but don't think I could re-learn at this late stage!
FEnewbee wrote: » Ok, I've covered the following: Institutions Supremacy Direct Effect Preliminary Ref Judicial Review MSL FMOG FMOW Citizenship and Equality I might have a flick over Fundamental Rights and FMOS if I have time tomorrow just to get some cases in my head. I know there is no competition/state aid/mergers in there cause I hate it with a burning passion...so I guess my question is am I gonna get burned if I leave it out? Also if I was to cover it, am I better off doing Art 101/102 or what? I know someone mentioned there will have been 4 EU papers this year so I'm just freaking out that I won't be able to do five questions cause I avoided competition and I'm **** at the case note question.
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » Institutions/Sources of EU Law Direct Effect Judicial Review Free Movement of Goods General Principles Competition Law State Aid Preliminary Reference Procedure Then if I have time: Workers Citizenship Equality
bluerthanu wrote: » I hopefully won’t regret saying this on Friday, but is the whole he has to set four papers this year thing being a bit over analysed? Like they have to set two a year, what’s the difference? As far as I can see, the three papers this year were the same as the usual trend with every paper having one of: FMOG, JR, DE, general principles, competition, FMOW/citizenship (I haven’t looked closely at these but I just bundle them together in my head), and the case notes. The only difference I can see is that in March institutions appeared along with all those topics and in the two August papers it was two questions on FMOG. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m just reading all these posts about topic changes wondering where people are getting the idea from? I’m only doing FMOG, DE, JR, GP’s and Institutions, and knowing enough to scrape a pass on Citizenship/FMOW, so I’m just assuming that’s me covered going by all the past years tbh.
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » Contract My head is fried after today and can’t manage to understand communication of acceptance starting to get stressed over it now Am I right in saying that the general rule is entores so when and where the offeror learns of it or should learn from it but in non instantaneous communication the postal rule could apply depending where the court feels the risk should lie? Something really simple just don’t have the head for it right now lol
phildub wrote: » The only thing I would say about state aid is that is might be relevant in the current climate so I've looked it over, but I suppose we won't know until Friday!
Fe1user5555 wrote: » Last question so sorry! Is anyone leaving out fundamental rights? I haven’t looked at it much at all and really don’t know if I will have time tomorrow unless it is a very easy learn
Spreece wrote: » Looking at past papers, institutions, direct effect, A263(4), FMOG are 99% certain which means only one other topic is required. FMOW, Competition and Citizenship cover that risk adequately I think. Views??
fe1fi20 wrote: » Penalty clauses & liquidated damages came up in March, is there a chance of it coming up tomorrow?
legallyginger wrote: » Perhaps a bit late now but does anybody know if you'll be harshly marked if case name isn't 100% or you don't give the details for them?
Fedone wrote: » I’ve forgotten case names in all of my exams so far, I find them really hard to remember but where it happened I made reference to a fact of the case that it would be known by and I’ve still passed the question.
