maccored wrote: » what bit of smoke? Have you issues with reading? Arent you going to tell me your makey uppy story about the 'retarded man'?
McMurphy wrote: » I could have sworn you and I discussed mandatory pension deductions a few times, what are the current govt doing, or have they done to address the pension time bomb? Superannuation or mandatory pension plans should be what they are looking into, but no we've clowns on twitter technically breaking the law making videos on scooters telling us how the scooter he's riding isn't technically legal, and USA politics style tweets attacking their opponents.
maccored wrote: » Good for you - though its 'Ferrero Rocher'
maccored wrote: » so have I - but enabling people to afford a private pension is the best answer to the issue.
christy c wrote: » You have been telling us how you voted for FG in 2011 and 2016, maybe your ability to smell BS is not so bad after all seen as you choose them over SF
maccored wrote: » youre the one quoting it every 5 mins. I expect the government to make sure the country is in a position to pay a decent enough wage for people to be able to look after themselves and prepare for their future. If you are happy with the **** we have, then thats your issue and not mine.
Piehead wrote: » Correct. They need the €4m to keep tank-beast in chocolate and Ferraro Rocher
FrancieBrady wrote: » I think SF will face economic realities if in government like them all christy. Maybe I am lucky, I can smell bull**** election auctions a mile off, most who have an interest in politics can. The biased think their own smells of lavender.
christy c wrote: » Are the actuaries wrong then? The projections of only 2 tax payers to every pensioner versus 5 at the moment are not an issue?
mynamejeff wrote: » well be careful with that bit of smoke anyway , people have been known to be shot in the legs for that sort for thing in some parts ….
maccored wrote: » why are you asking me about your own post. You posted it - you work out how you were talking about. Its somebody you claim would eat 4million euros worth of chocolate so obviously you were attempting to be a keyboard warrior if you cant remember who you were posting about then just dont bother posting anything
christy c wrote: » I certainly do, given the rise of a party with such a stupid approach to pensions it will be badly needed unfortunately
christy c wrote: » The one liner was said by the leader of your own party, which goes against projections from those far more qualified than her. If we want well paid jobs, an idea might be not to give the two fingers to corporate tax payers who provide thousands of well paying jobs in Ireland.
maccored wrote: » hope you have a private pension christy - otherwise youre part of the problem
maccored wrote: » whoever was posting about needing 4 million for chocolate? thats a terrible thing to be saying oh oh ohh - tell us about the 'mentally ill man' grandad - I love your stories
Piehead wrote: » Who’s fat enough to be shamed ?
maccored wrote: » course it will - if theres enough well paid jobs to ensure the majority of the population has a private pension (which there isnt). Hard to predict the future, and futures usually depend on a variety of factors ... not one liners that you can quote on forums.
maccored wrote: » aye - caught out fat shaming somebody, thats why you wont
mynamejeff wrote: » openly supports murders and criminals and a party who exploited a mentally ill man but draws the line at fat shaming ? parody surely
[Deleted User] wrote: » Surely with highest birth rate in the eu,re-instatement of social and knock on effext of affordable housing,will see people who putting off starting families etc Would give rise to demographics sort itself??
christy c wrote: » So do SF not think the demographics will look after themselves?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Pretty seismic example of why partition has failed taking place right now in Belfast.https://twitter.com/search?q=%22The%20DUP%22&src=trend_click&vertical=trends
christy c wrote: » Part of the answer is to increase the age which is what FG want and actually signed up to under Kenny. Sf's answer is to think the demographics will look after themselves. And idiotic SF fans lap that up. Difficult to believe people could be that stupid.
FrancieBrady wrote: » All parties make promises/offer things in election politics christy. If we were to run a test on election promise made vs election promises fulfilled since the foundation of the state, how do you think it would fare out? As I said, treat election politics with a large doze of salt. None of them keep them anyway. If it's too good to be true you can guarantee it won't be implemented.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/election-2020-parties-warned-of-insane-election-promises-as-varadkar-offers-martin-coalition-1.4148383 I think the DoF said that only one party's manifesto was credible last time out.
McMurphy wrote: » Do the handlers of that account wilfully ignore the 90% of the replies that piss take FG, call them out on hypocrisy, call them out on having no substance or integrity at all etc etc? John, FG are absolutely and completely fcuking shyting themselves over the Shinners about to topple them, don't try and come back and dismiss this keen observation of mine, the dogs on the street can see it. The public opinion is firmly against FG right now, and not for the first time I've said this, but for jaysis same, whoever has the password to that Twitter account needs their privileges removed. Yet another PR crash and burn on twitter, it's fcukin embarrassing at this stage.
