maccored wrote: » the RUC had 50 grand of that - have you asked them? Again, come forth with your info that SF stole anything ...
FrancieBrady wrote: » Where is your evidence here. Who did they 'refuse to co-operate with'? I will remind you obstructing an inquiry or refusing to co-operate with an inquiry is a crime. Was anyone from SF even arrested in connection with this? The IMC and the PSNI and The Gardai know who did it. Knowing who did it isn't the problem. Never denied by me, that former members are involved in crime. I agree with the IMC, the IRA as an organisation did not sanction or commit this crime. There was no obligation on the IRA to be gone, the obligation was to cease military actions and organising and to decommission. All of that was complied with or else the IMC and the two governments are lying to us. I made my decision to vote for SF after reading all the available information on the activities of the IRA.
blanch152 wrote: » Paul Quinn's family have made it clear that Conor Murphy should give a statement to the Gardai and the PSNI identifying the IRA people he met to discuss the case. He has refused to do so, to be fair, probably because he hasn't been given permission to do so. Pretending that the Gardai have the information they need is trite. It is a clear example of refusing to co-operate and ignoring victims.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » This is great news. SF are using the border and partition for their own gain so they can pocket the 4 million they received from the will of a mentally ill and gullible man who was effectively groomed for his money.https://twitter.com/FineGael/status/1326593739763093513?s=20
FrancieBrady wrote: » Getting the popcorn as FG's latest bout of bitterness spectacularly backfires on them.
Piehead wrote: » Sure the €4m is needed to keep the tank-beast in chocolate and Ferraro Rocher !
JohnnyFlash wrote: » A load of Shinnerbots, cranks, and oddballs getting angry on Twitter isn't unexpected, Francie. It's what the online army do. They've gone rogue on SF. Do you think SF should return the money?
maccored wrote: » when in doubt, fat shame someone. that your mantra?
Piehead wrote: » Who’s fat?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Why would they 'return' it? Ridiculous bitterness from FG.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Well this William Hampton dude left money to SF. The key line in the will signed by Hampton, in a solicitor’s offices in Cootehill, Co Cavan, in 1997, says that he is leaving the money to the “political party in the Republic of Ireland known at this time as Sinn Féin”. However the money is now residing with SF in NI, which has conveniently used the border for their own economic gain. Now I know that SF don't actually recognise the legitimacy of the Republic of Ireland, its constitution, or its defence forces, but surely this use of the border and partition must stick in the craw of the Good Republicans?? Now we know SF have over 200 employees, so this 1.6m wouldn't even cover the wage bill for a year, but I suppose the optics aren't great when SF are using the border so they can avoid laws and rules down here. Partitionist party?
maccored wrote: » you sir have been shown to be waffling, and more waffle wont get you out of it.
maccored wrote: » whoever your 'tankbeast' is
Piehead wrote: » Who do you think tank-beast is?
christy c wrote: » Hahaha, we have a party that thinks the demographics will look after themselves and you call them economically literate. Yet you say I'm waffling.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Well this William Hampton dude left money to SF. The key line in the will signed by Hampton, in a solicitor’s offices in Cootehill, Co Cavan, in 1997, says that he is leaving the money to the “political party in the Republic of Ireland known at this time as Sinn Féin”. The dude wasn't well at the time - he was just after chopping off his own cock - a tactic Bobby Storey's nutting squad used on victims once or twice btw. However the money is now residing with SF in NI, which has conveniently used the border for their own economic gain. Now I know that SF don't actually recognise the legitimacy of the Republic of Ireland, its constitution, or its defence forces, but surely this use of the border and partition must stick in the craw of the Good Republicans?? Now we know SF have over 200 employees, so this 1.6m wouldn't even cover the wage bill for a year, but I suppose the optics aren't great when SF are using the border so they can avoid laws and rules down here. Partitionist party?
maccored wrote: » you tell me .... unless you don't know what you are typing
maccored wrote: » as I have already replied to you, the current government haven't control of the pension bomb of the future - so why do you expect the opposition to have the answer? The reason I reckon is because you quote sound bytes and dont have anything of substance to say
Piehead wrote: » I won’t tell you anything.
christy c wrote: » I dont expect them to have the answer, I just don't expect them to be stupid enough to think the demographics will look after themselves. Simple but maybe too difficult for a SF fan to understand.
maccored wrote: » boys but thats a fantastic comeback that is. even the oul insult thrown in! Jaysus Christy but youre great. FF and FG have no answer to the issue at all - thats obviously so simple its went over your head
McMurphy wrote: » Do the handlers of that account wilfully ignore the 90% of the replies that piss take FG, call them out on hypocrisy, call them out on having no substance or integrity at all etc etc? John, FG are absolutely and completely fcuking shyting themselves over the Shinners about to topple them, don't try and come back and dismiss this keen observation of mine, the dogs on the street can see it. The public opinion is firmly against FG right now, and not for the first time I've said this, but for jaysis same, whoever has the password to that Twitter account needs their privileges removed. Yet another PR crash and burn on twitter, it's fcukin embarrassing at this stage.
FrancieBrady wrote: » All parties make promises/offer things in election politics christy. If we were to run a test on election promise made vs election promises fulfilled since the foundation of the state, how do you think it would fare out? As I said, treat election politics with a large doze of salt. None of them keep them anyway. If it's too good to be true you can guarantee it won't be implemented.https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/election-2020-parties-warned-of-insane-election-promises-as-varadkar-offers-martin-coalition-1.4148383 I think the DoF said that only one party's manifesto was credible last time out.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c6e76a2e0d85c3808d93c2f75a0c528d.svg)
