lsheehaneire wrote: » It mentioned criminal sanctions in delegated legislation so I presumed it was prompting principles and policies....oh christ knows
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » Is there anywhere I could get something on the consumer insurance contract act in relation to misrepresentation? My manual doesn’t seem to have anything
SKLaw wrote: » Dillon Eustace has a good article about it, in my opinion https://www.dilloneustace.com/legal-updates/consumer-insurance-contracts-act-2019-commenced
fe1fi20 wrote: » whats this in relation to?
FE12020Law wrote: » Anyone else's confidence regrading law taking a battering when it comes to these exams? In my undergrad and postgrad I was consistently getting 2.1s/1.1s in all my law modules. When it comes to the Fe1s 3 of the exams I passed where all just over 50. I'm starting to think I might not be cut out for law. If I'm finding it this hard now who knows what the PPC course will be like. I don't fancy not being able to make it at the last stage.
XxMCRxBabyxX wrote: » I know this is from almost a week ago but I wanted to give an point of view from someone who is (very!) nearly qualified. The FE1s very nearly killed me and I'm honestly still a little scarred by them. I sat 21 exams over 6 sittings in three years. I cried after almost every exam and again when my results came through. I went from being a consistent high 2.1 student to my highest result being a 52 in the few passes that I managed. I almost have up several times and am not really sure how I kept going if I'm honest. But somehow I did, and PPC was a dream after them. It does involve work but it's completely different. It's open book so far more about your organisation skills than having to cram everything. And working in the office is completely different again. The FE1s are the Leaving Cert of Law. Once you pass them, you never need to worry about them again. Unless you're me and still have nightmares about them... If you or anyone else would like to PM me, please do. I'm happy to offer any support now that I'm at the other side!
LeagleEagle747 wrote: » This really could not have come at a better time to me. Family issues meant I played it safe and only chose to do 3 this sitting and hoping to do the other 5 next sitting, which I now really regret. Feel as though I'm not bright enough despite having a masters in law but you've really made me feel so much better about this whole shebang. Thank you so much for this!
lsheehaneire wrote: » Constitution Just wondering did anyone attempt the locus standi jus tertii question? I think all I gave was a one liner in relation to the cases mentioned and then just talked about standing in a general sense... I must say its quite unfair when you know a topic well and the majority of case law ,and then more recent case law are thrown in and that jeopardises that question. It feels like the paper is actively trying to catch you out by providing you with an essay option but then it throws in very recent case law that you may not be aware of. Similarly, the case note question seemed to be based all on more recent cases... is there an easy way to keep track of recent cases ?
lsheehaneire wrote: » Thanks for your lovely message, it very kind of you. Any chance you could tell us your least favourite subject? 😉
jus_me wrote: » I attempted this.... gave one liner on each of the cases he mentioned and went on and just spoke about standing (with mentioning jus terrii randomly throughout without any real reason to mention it) winged it basically
Iso_123 wrote: » The fishing question was my last one i answered it on article 10 natural resources and barlow case (although i said barlow v minister for environment when its actually barlow v minister for agriculture ugh) and then also mentioned right to earn a livelihood and proportionality? not sure if that was right though and also hate myself for getting the case name half wrong!!
XxMCRxBabyxX wrote: » I'm presuming this was meant for me? It's probably Company (which is ironic because I'm now in a corporate firm) but that's probably because I got unlucky and not had to sit it four times but the legislation also changed for the last two!
Fe7 wrote: » Thanks for sharing. What approach did you take to learning? Did you learn outwards in (ie manuals and such then focus on exam sample answers, if any?) or did you make your way backwards in a sense, ie. by learning sample answers then expanding what you knew in those areas with reading/learning to have a grasp of the principles? I have heard of a lot of people doing the latter and sailing through the FE1s. Of course thats without the legislative changes as you mentioned, which just throws a wrench into it all. Edit: punctuation.
arubamuuu wrote: » Contract Does anyone know what the name of the case is where the plaintiff was a supplier and the defendant was I believe a supermarket. They never had a written agreement as the defendant had a policy of not entering into contracts with suppliers and the defendant then decided they wanted to get their products from someone else. The court held that since the defendant had such a policy they wouldn't imply a contract. I know I have it somewhere in my manual/notes but I've been searching and cannot find it. I really hope someone knows what case I'm talking about lol
Dancing Obsession wrote: » I approached this question and give similar answer. I think that I only put barlow, so don't worry about it.
Fe1user5555 wrote: » What’s everyone focusing on for EU?
shaunamarie wrote: » Dakota packaging v Wyeth medica I think !
katie5843 wrote: » In EU does anyone know the application of Articles 34-36 TFEU specifically to internal situations? I keep seeing it referenced on the examiner reportsbut its not in the manauls or lectures etc im using.
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » Institutions/Sources of EU Law Direct Effect Judicial Review Free Movement of Goods General Principles Competition Law State Aid Preliminary Reference Procedure Then if I have time: Workers Citizenship Equality
Fe1user5555 wrote: » Thanks so much!! Just regarding preliminary reference procedure my grid says it hasn’t been up since 2014 are you doing it in conjunction with a different topic? Sorry I just hadn’t planned on looking at it
Fedone wrote: » Plus the English case along those lines was Baird Textile Holdings v Marks and Spencer
awsah wrote: » it came up again in aug 2019. I'm worried that as this is the 4th EU paper this year that anything is liable to come up!!
