ellachapman96 wrote: » I was the exact same! Just answered the essay based on Mohan cos I didn't know the P case so completely ignored it. And I literally wrote a few lines off Roche cos I had no choice but to do it cos the other questions I didn't know at all. I found it such a hard paper. But it seems like a lot of others did too so hopefully he'll take it into consideration.
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » I read over it earlier but my own hunch is one question on the independence of the judiciary (so like appointment, immunity from suit, dismissal and pay) and one question on international relations (particular emphasis here on an essay Q on Crotty and Pringle). Of course there is no way to know for certain. Then I imagine: essay question on disputed result of a referendum; problem question on freedom of expression and company; problem question on freedom of religion and equality. Essay question on one of Pres/AG/constitutional interpretation/natural law. Problem question on trial in due course of law. Essay question on duty to give reasons (fair procedures). If not the above - perhaps a question on the right to life of the unborn/the right to refuse medical treatment.
Costello95 wrote: » Pleaseee would anyone have predictions for contract? What’s the bare minimum we could learn? V stressed!
Iso_123 wrote: » Did anyone answer the livelihood/property essay? thoughts on it?
EAA123 wrote: » i attempted it and found it hard enough to link the two of them together. used cases like hand, cox, greally, cases and nvh wbu?
Coopie wrote: » I thought it was about subordinate legislation.
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » I too would be welcome to any predictions
ellachapman96 wrote: » What are people covering for contract tomorrow? Thinking of leaving out privity and mistake since they were both up in March but not sure if too risky! Maybe terms too
orlaghs wrote: » i would also love any predictions I'm trying to cover: Offer and acceptance consideration + promissory estoppel exemption clauses consumer protections misrepresentation mistake discharge of contracts remedies (damages) Feeling very swamped at the moment as there is so much possibility of what could come up
FE1Lordthe2nd wrote: » Hey, Which question was privity in March?
Aoibhin511 wrote: » Q4
fe1fi20 wrote: » privity didnt come up in March
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » Great paper, very predictable.
Aoibhin511 wrote: » yeah it did: Máire is the owner of the Comfy Café. She decides to expand her café and hires Bob to build a fully completed extension on the existing premises. The contract between Máire and Bob clearly states that the work is to be finished by the 31 January 2020, and it includes a penalty clause which says Bob is to be liable for the loss caused by any delays, howsoever caused.Bob enters into sub-contract with Charles, a local plumber in town. Charles agrees to carry our all the plumbing work on the extension by 31 December 2019. Bob emphasises that it is essential that his work be done on time. However, by mid-November 2019 it becomes clear that Charles will not be able to complete the work on time. Charles demands €5,000 to enable him to hire extra workers so he can finish the work on time. However, once the work is done Bob writes Charles a letter saying he is not going to pay Charles the extra €5,000. He says he only agreed to the extra money under duress, and that Charles “did nothing extra to earn the cash”. In addition, Máire is unhappy with some of the plumbing work completed by Charles. She claims that water leaks from the pipes and is causing damage to her floors. She is threatening to sue Charles for breach of contract. Advise Charles.
nmurphy1441 wrote: » I remember this now!!! Completely forgot about the privy part! Can you remember what you said if you answered it?
