Rhys Essien wrote: » Along with the pandemic, I wonder were Tower Holdings also holding off on moving on with the Prism to wait for the outcome of the election, given that all their business and financial backing is in the States. You would hope with Biden in charge from January and now with a possible vaccine the markets and everything else will be on the up with a bit of stability around. I imagine things will also bode better for them getting a tenant.
marno21 wrote: » Indeed. Newly competent global leadership, evidence that there is an exit from the coronavirus pandemic and a co-ordinated strategic approach to renewing the Cork docklands are three massive news stories from the last week. I posted the link above from my phone earlier and now have a chance to type properly. The above news story is the definition of a game changer. I have frequently posted here about the disjointed, ad hoc development that has happened to date in the Docklands. We've seen the OCP purchase of the Origin lands, the renders of the Tedcastles and Ford sites but no centralised plan as to how this is all going to link together. There is no point in building 3,000 apartments near the Pairc with the current **** heaps of roads linking them sites to the city, along with the fact that those sites are located at the end of a cul de sac with no supporting infrastructure at the end of a derelict industrial wasteland. A proper, inter agency, co-ordinated approach to redeveloping the South Docks along with the area around Kent Station is the best thing that could happen to this city. Along with the Port of Cork development in Tivoli, the other 2 areas being redeveloped will strengthen the case for the proposed public transport projects and with the inter agency approach we could see a proper, co-ordinated attempt to finally get some of the long stalled projects (both public and private) off the ground. There is so much case for optimism if this goes ahead. The disjoined approach of yesterday gives way to a newly co-ordinated attempt at proper progress
D'Agger wrote: » Well said re: co-ordinated approach A minor point on the bit in bold but I noticed at the weekend the new cycle lanes in the marina have been setup since I was last there - with kerbs put up to prevent them being parked on i.e. around match days which is a huge plus....this should be standard procedure but for many years in Cork, simply hasn't been the case. It does seem as though more thought and planning & learning from previous mistakes is being taken into account going forward which is good to see.
Curb Your Enthusiasm wrote: » What's wrong with normal matching-up windows like the buildings in between them?
cantalach wrote: » Those new semi-segregated cycle tracks are a very welcome development for sure. I’m a little concerned at the way in which the tracks cross entrances to businesses. The posts pause too soon before the entrances and resume too late. I’ve already seen cars parked on the cycle track in this convenient little “parking space”. Hopefully they will revisit that. And if I was to be really picky - and I am - it is a pity that they have made Centrepark Road the outbound route and Monaghan Road the inbound route. If you visualise it as a circle, this is clockwise and that means a lot more right turns which is higher risk. The old Monaghan Road league race used to go anti-clockwise for good reason.
hans aus dtschl wrote: » Let's not be overly negative: it's a good effort and it's appreciated. We can fight for improvements and perfection, but this is some of the first usable cycle infrastructure in the city in a long time.
whisky_galore wrote: » Needs to be all "modhern" and edgy like. It annoys people with OCD. Ugly, but not as ugly as the crashed alien spaceship outside Kent.
Deleted User wrote: » At least the spaceship has a fighter hanger bay
the beer revolu wrote: » I'm going to go out on my own and say that I like the Hoor's Motel replacement. I'm not in love with it but I kinda like it. It's a little bit unusual, the size is right for the location and I think it fits in nicely. Please try to be polite in your disagreement. I haven't questioned the sanity or insulted people who profess to hating this building, please afford me the same courtesy.
bingo9999 wrote: » Its true - always easy to point out the own goals from CCC (and they are regular and cheap), but to me there does feel like there is a big concerted effort going on in there lately to do a lot of good things that people have been asking for for a long time. In circumstances of much reduced income we shouldnt forget to be thankful for the positive changes and encourage (rather than naysay) for more.
Bishopstown housing development given the go-ahead by Cork city councillors A CONTENTIOUS housing development at the junction of Hawkes Road and Bishopstown Road has been given the green light by Cork city councillors.
marno21 wrote: » Government looking for a clause to stop land with approved planning hoardinghttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/use-it-or-lose-it-law-being-drafted-for-planning-permissions-1.4405671?mode=amp HQ, Albert Quay, Railway Gardens in the spotlight here
blindsider wrote: » ...add Wilton Shopping Centre and Sullivan's Quay to that too...
fonecrusher1 wrote: » There's been talk of leveling that place and a new entire shopping complex built for 15 years at least. I remember seeing an article in the Echo around 2010ish. Its well past its life span, it should have been knocked and replaced years ago.
hans aus dtschl wrote: » And yet not a bad customer experience IMO. I much prefer Wilton to Mahon Point. Douglas also. They have a "little town centre" feel.
blindsider wrote: » Without going too far off-topic....IMO wilton has a 'shopping centre' feel to it and that's what they should re-develop. MP is a 'mall' with all the misery* that goes with it.....
marno21 wrote: » Custom House Tower appealed....http://www.pleanala.ie/casenum/308596.htm