letowski wrote: » While its good for the Democrats to enjoy getting their guy in the White House, they cannot over look the fact that they had many losses this week across America. Leaving aside the presidential race which Biden one relatively narrowly, Trump made gains across many minority groups, especially in Democratic stronghold like Miami-Dade and the Rio Grande Valley. Youngstown in eastern Ohio was one by Trump, only 8 years ago Obama was winning there by +27 points. Biden made gains among the white male vote, but the GOP will back themselves to win that back in 2024 and potentially hold the Trump minority numbers with a less racist president. In the senate races, the Democrats missed a massive opportunity to take control. Maybe it was the faulty polls again, but losing in Maine, Iowa and North Carolina was most disappointing. Questions must be asked about the decision to pump $200m into long shot senate races in Kentucky and South Carolina. In the House, the GOP made huge gains leaving the Democrats with its slimmest majority in twenty years. Make no mistake, the House will be up for grabs in 2022, and the Dems will have to pull themselves together. The Dems did not even win one state legislator position this week either. I think leadership at the top isn't working. The GOP will look to charter a course of holding the senate, winning the House in 2022 and go for the trifecta in 2024 against an 82 year old incumbent president (potentially). Fair enough, the GOP are too in an internal crisis with what direction they need to take in a post Trump era, but leaders at the top will have reason for optimism. As I've said, the Democratic party should enjoy today, but there needs to be a full review of where they are going as a political party in the US.
Francie Barrett wrote: » The Republicans lost the presidency, but held the senate and made gains in the house. For me, this election was more of a vote against Trump, rather than support for Biden, or the Democrats in general. Privately, I think the Republicans will feel pretty good about this election. Trump made a balls over COVID, which undoubtedly cost them votes. COVID made a balls of the economy (unemployment went from record lows to 8% right now) which cost them more votes. It's incredible that in spite of everything, Trump came as close as he did to winning. I think if Republicans get the right candidate next time, they can let the Democrats go down the "democratic socialist" route and they will be in a really good position for 2024. Of course, they may decide to double down on Trump, hopefully they won't be so stupid.
Five Eighth wrote: » It’s a bit rich to describe millions of people who voted for Trump and GOP as ‘idiots’. My point is that they did, in fact, vote for Trump and they obviously did so for good reason i.e. someone who they believed respected their worldview and articulated their hopes and aspirations. The main point is not whether Trump did or did not actually believe what he was saying but that millions of natural Democrat voters believed him and rejected the Democrats. They shouldn’t be regarded as ‘idiots’ or ‘deplorables’ for doing so. I assume you read the previous posts on this issue.
Rjd2 wrote: » They haven't held the senate yet tbf. 2 races in Georgia will determine that in January.
Water John wrote: » That will be some battle
sdanseo wrote: » If this tweet is to be believed, is there anything to be said for some chance of Biden taking NC - My maths, and please correct me if wrong, and disregarding 3rd party candidates if there are 5% of votes still outsnading, would mean Biden needs 64.4% of the mail ins to win.
Itssoeasy wrote: » That six one close which had joe Biden reading a Seamus Heaney poem is getting shared a lot on Twitter. I’ve seen Alyssa Milano and Keith olbermann tweet about it. In fairness it’s a well done video.
Brussels Sprout wrote: » According to this site Biden needs 69% of the 188k votes left. It certainly seems possible but everybody in the know seems to think it's a long shot.
Brian? wrote: » Holy Jaysus, I’d stopped watching NC 2 days ago. If Biden takes it , that’s a genuine landslide.
breezy1985 wrote: » So if people voted for Trump because they believe that like them he is racist or sexist would that be a good reason. Should I then respect them and not think them idiots? And if they voted for the billionaire who was against Obamacare from day one because he was the man who would look out for the working man then why not call them fools?
Redordeadqwwer wrote: » I'm kind of lost here, Biden making a victory speech but Trump saying it isn't over? Will Trump concede eventually and make a speech or will they have to force him out of office? When does he have to be 'out' technically? Silly questions I know.
Water John wrote: » Lovely to see families in Delaware, esp young girls. A day of change.
DM_2092 wrote: » I'm glad Biden won, but I will Miss Donny for his entertainment value.
valoren wrote: » A concession is not necessary. It has no systemic significance. It's merely a partisan gesture of acknowledging the other side won. It's akin to a metaphorical handshake after a sporting contest. Trump will never concede. The counting will finish and mid December the electoral college will cast their votes. The suits will ultimately amount to nothing and come noon on the 21st January he is no longer the President. I'm not sure if he has ever actually read the US Constitution but I'm sure someone in the inner circle will explain the machinations of it all to him.
Exclamation Marc wrote: » I will not. And I look forward to him not being on Twitter when he eventually shoots himself in the foot.
valoren wrote: » I'm not sure if he has ever actually read the US Constitution
Itssoeasy wrote: » Yeah come 12:01pm on January 20th, 2021 the deference that Twitter have given the sitting American president will not apply so he can’t just rant like a mad man and say what he likes because unlike from 2017 to 2021 they won’t be protected.
listermint wrote: » This reads as bitter ? Maybe I'm taking it up wrong but definitely appears bitter ? I recall a president slating the armed forces, slating their dead, slating the deads families and calling anyone caught a loser. Sure would be the guy that I'd defend if i was a member. He sounds tip top class... Oh and taking zero action or saying anything about an enemy putting bounties on my men.
Overheal wrote: » Is this type of activity legal?
If Starbucks gave hipsters free coffee for voting Fox News would melt down.
prawnsambo wrote: » To be fair, Manic drove tanks in Afghanistan. That's pretty exposed in the political winds department.