grayzer75 wrote: » This isn't a SF thread is it?
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Seems to go on in most parties Franciehttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/election-2020-sinn-f-in-has-not-learned-lesson-over-bullying-claims-wtzrq5xm6 Can you as a supporter point to any action taken?
FrancieBrady wrote: » That's internal bullying and sexual harrassment claims that have been made. Can you as a supporter point to any actions that have been taken? Without deflecting to another party.
blanch152 wrote: » Hopefully this will be dealt with. Can't have the Greens sinking to the depths of Sinn Fein and ignoring these issues.
FrancieBrady wrote: » More trouble for the Greens. Serious allegations here.https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40076093.html
The former chairwoman of the Young Greens has claimed the party did nothing when she reported alleged sexual harassment. Tara Gilsenan, who recently left the party, says that she and another member reported the incidents to the party and, when nothing was done, she felt she had no other choice but to speak openly about the issue in her speech during the convention. She said a member of the Young Greens began harassing another girl, "and eventually moved on and came for me". Ms Gilsenan says the person would touch her inappropriately and make comments on her appearance and body. "I didn't know what to do," she said. "When I rejected them, it pissed them off, they started talking over and down to me." She said she eventually reported the situation to senior members who took notes and they said they would do something. However, she said nothing ever happened.
Bowie wrote: » I take it you do not approve of Leo's actions or are you an admirer of the cute hoor type, (not that Leo is IMO, he got caught and had to apologise) regardless of what they do and any consequences there may be? I don't think FG give a **** about many things. It's not to be commended IMO.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Any guesses who might have leaked Cabinet meeting details?
Bishop of hope wrote: » A bit of a rift, with Varadkar taking the Taoiseach side over Coveney. Seething Coveney it seems and perhaps payback by Leo, don't know yet what to make of it. But I'd be thinking things migh not be comfortable for a while in the FG camp.https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/republic-of-ireland/major-row-breaks-out-in-irish-cabinet-over-shared-island-unit-39706058.html
blanch152 wrote: » Not giving a sh!t what Pearse is saying should be a minimum qualification to become a TD.
Bowie wrote: » So that's a yes. Bizarre Maryanne.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Nothing wrong with that, Ess.
Deleted User wrote: » I’m very touched that you rate my opinion so highly. Thank you for that. Seeing as you already know my opinion, I’m not going to bore other posters by repeating it.
Solutionking wrote: » Leo is a slippery one, he knew exactly what he was doing when he shared that document. He was sitting laughing at all the opposition, do you not think so? just look at him, he is reading and drinking, he didn't give a sh*t what Pearse was saying.
Solutionking wrote: » Did I say the message was wrong? the way he delivers it is the issue. If he wasn't constantly ranting and raving more people would actually listen. He has bought into the "if I shout loudest people will listen". Unfortunately that doesn't work.
Bowie wrote: » Do you still believe he did nothing wrong, if so what did he apologise for? Do you still believe the contents were already in the public domain, despite Leo and the facts disagreeing with you?
Bowie wrote: » You claiming Leo's apology was insincere?
Bowie wrote: » What did he say that was incorrect?
Deleted User wrote: » What questions do you want me to answer?
Bowie wrote: » Any chance you'll start answering questions Maryanne? You post ludicrous statements passing them as fact then move on when called out.
Solutionking wrote: » More ranting and raving. Leo was sipping away on a drink :P doesn't look like he gave a sh*t.
Solutionking wrote: » Does anyone actually take Pearse Doherty seriously anymore? well apart from SF fans. It was fun at the start as nobody had seen him ranting and raving before, now no matter what the topic is or what the conversation is, it's the exact same ranting and raving. Maybe it is time he tried a new approach.
Deleted User wrote: » You posted a link without your own view/comment. Just wondering why?
Solutionking wrote: » Would it not be worth discussing important topics? what are the government doing about crime? The only reason the media is running it now, nothing on RTE last night or any channel, is because the majority of people have the video in watsapp It should have been the top story on RTE!!!
Solutionking wrote: » You are claiming now journalists are unbiased?
McMurphy wrote: » I know I posted this on the other Leo thread, but this clip of Peter Burke making a complete and utter haimes of him being sent out to bat for Leo is epic.https://twitter.com/TonightVMTV/status/1323766293984661504?s=09 Blows "the govt clever strategy line" clean out of the water. A strategy where MOT asked Harris for the contract, and was declined, then asked Leo - Leo said leave it with me, requested it, then sent it off behind everyone's back. A strategy? Leo needs to read my signature. :pac:
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/f054c80ff399c4eba8d719c617220a57.svg)
