murpho999 wrote: » Yes I've been watching CNN most of the time. King has been excellent. Even last night when numbers looked good for Trump and people here were calling the election done and using claiming that betting exchanges are the best indicators for elections (:rolleyes:), he was saying it could all change and how the order of how votes are counted and the urban centres etc. He 's been excellent and proven right today.
Faugheen wrote: » Fox’s election coverage is excellent. Their problem is the absolute shock jock goons they have posing as journalists on their schedule.
TomOnBoard wrote: » Yeah, Brett Baier and Martha Mc Callum have been steady. None of the Gutfield or Ingraham histrionics. For me however, the John King/Wolf Blitzer twofer has been the most exciting and informative.. Jeez, King has some head for sums!!!
StringerBell wrote: » Well....thats a separate issue but okay, I wouldn't be a huge fan of some of the LP guys either. Okay, was just responding to a poster who was saying the trump campaign had no money left.
OhHiMark wrote: » This isn't true. Virginia was called by the guardian (and possibly the AP) when Trump was ahead. A few states were called before a single vote was counted.
For Forks Sake wrote: » Biden closing in at a rate of knots in Georgia
TomOnBoard wrote: » Yeah, I dunno. All I do know is that I believe there was an irrational exuberance attached to The Lincoln Project, as though they were some kind of Robin Hoods, when in fact, they were just the Sheriff of Nottingham in disguise!
TomOnBoard wrote: » Both campaigns are doing that as we speak.
murpho999 wrote: » I've switched over to Fox from CNN. I'm surprsied at Fox's coverage. 2 calm and balanced presenters and they have interviewed representatives from both parties and challenged Trumpr representative for evidence of voter fraud.
This is it wrote: » Presume that's Arizona? Leaving the Nevada 6 for 270
Harry Palmr wrote: » Ah now, no earthly reason to go down that route. Kamala Harris will be the Dems nominee in any event as she'll almost certainly take over after the mid terms should Biden win.
Strumms wrote: » Only about 7,500 in it in Nevada
Mellor wrote: » No new outlet has called any state based on patterns of votes for a candidate who is behind . It's universally when they are ahead with an gap that can't be closesd.
StringerBell wrote: » Been sending out e-mails (a lot of them) fundraising for the legal fight.
StringerBell wrote: » You'd wonder if it was either A. The support for trump helped the GOP down ballot because trump B. The assumption that Biden had it in the bag and typical GOP voters wanted to ensure there was a check on his power.
DubInMeath wrote: » AP correct in how they are calling so far? Biden 264, Trump 214
Francie Barrett wrote: » He spent all his campaign money days ago.
Trigger wrote: » No, they are still calling Arizona, which still has plenty left to play for
Harry Palmr wrote: » It's bit early to ask, but what the heck - who'd be in line for the GOP in 2024?
briany wrote: » Trump's lawsuits generally have him standing to gain something, even if it's just a countersuit to stop himself getting done on something. He would have nothing to gain from a lawsuit over the PA vote if it ended up not even mattering to the overall result, so I don't see him pursuing it.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/f07ee44b0b39bbb635066da4046d9475.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
