briany wrote: » Guiliani giving it welly, here. This is going to get ugly, isn't it?
thepogues wrote: » What's the big deal with news channels declaring, "we're calling it for "x"? Surely all that matters is the final count tally regardless of who claims it for whoever?
partyguinness wrote: » Trump can have PA. It doesn’t matter.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Looks like he'll win GA, NC, and PA. Only needs Nevada, and it's close there. Gap has closed in PA, but he's still so far ahead.
bennyl10 wrote: » Biden is seemingly going to take PA And Nevada is staying blue The votes are in heavy dem areas
moon2 wrote: » Generally speaking they have enough people looking at the stats to accurately predict the final tally. It doesn't *mean* anytihng, but it gives the ordinary person a somewhat informed/accurate estimate of the final outcome. It's kind of useful for states which have a trump lead yet are predicted to go biden based on info/patterns they've gathered, or vice versa. The average person couldn't make that leap.
Water John wrote: » AZ will up date voting two times tonight 9 pm and 12 am ET.
Water John wrote: » Why is Trump chasing AZ if it's not in play?
moon2 wrote: » Generally speaking they have enough people looking at the stats to accurately predict the final tally. It doesn't *mean* anytihng, but it gives the ordinary person a somewhat informed/accurate estimate of the final outcome.It's kind of useful for states which have a trump lead yet are predicted to go biden based on info/patterns they've gathered, or vice versa. The average person couldn't make that leap.
Itssoeasy wrote: » What’s this we have claimed talk from trump about ? Claimed ? It’s a presidential election not a pet who went missing and is found.
briany wrote: » It would be funny if Trump focuses all his rage on PA only for it not to have mattered anyway. Something tells me he wouldn't pursue the SC case out of simple principle.
prawnsambo wrote: » Nevada are releasing more numbers today. Apparently they feel the weight of history... Not joking about that, they realised they could be the state that gets the new President over the line.
Mellor wrote: » No new outlet has called any state based on patterns of votes for a candidate who is behind . It's universally when they are ahead with an gap that can't be closesd.
This is it wrote: » 60k behind in Georgia, is it possible to catch him? What's left and is it mail votes left?
droidus wrote: » PA being touted as +1 Biden assuming trends stay steady and the count continues. AZ a bit shaky, but it looks as if there's enough of a mix of urban and early votes to keep the dems on top. NZ still likely to stay blue. GA a tossup. 50/50. its gonna be close.
everlast75 wrote: » Wow. If I were a petty man, I'd yuck it up at the GOP tears. Good thing I'm not, eh?https://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/1324098069445660674?s=09 I haven't assumed Biden will win. Why are Trumpets assuming so?
Strumms wrote: » He is not a reasonable man, he is not a fair man...I don’t think he plays with a full deck quite frankly.... he is having his ass handed to him, he’s not used to that, he can’t take it, the world watching.
Strumms wrote: » He knows his game is up, he’s being close to actually being destroyed, yet he doesn’t give up gracefully, he’s trying to talk about challenging the results of the biggest democratic election in history of earth... on a hunch and zero evidence that there was fraud ?