[Deleted User] wrote: » Oh thanks! Didn’t get that at all but hopefully not detrimental as it’s just 5 marks
bozzer198 wrote: » Thanks was panicking so went straight to asking instead of reading the comments
Deleted User wrote: » In relation to the oppression q - what did people Say for part b? Would answer change if constitution/shareholders agreement contained provision for promotion of shareholders business?
BoyLaw937 wrote: » I know the question was specifically on s.212 but did you run through the rule in foss v hardbottle briefly or just leave it off?
shaunadennyham wrote: » How quickly after the tort exam yesterday did they tell people they could log back in to finish it?
jackwoodson wrote: » I ordered past papers but not sure they're going to deliver on time now, been a good while. Unsure whether I should give out about an post, law society, or to be fair - myself! For property: I have all papers until spring 2019 if anyone needs any (for any subject), and hoping someone could give me an idea of the topics from autumn 19 and spring 20 ? Thank you
Deleted User wrote: » Not to be that person after sitting just one exam but... do we think it’ll be new year before we get the results? Hate the thought of them hanging over us at Christmas ��
Deleted User wrote: » Not to be that person after sitting just one exam but... do we think it’ll be new year before we get the results? Hate the thought of them hanging over us at Christmas ��
Fe1new4 wrote: » I got through on phone to them just before 2 and I got the email telling me to log back in at 4-ish
EAA123 wrote: » Do think you would still get marks for answering the advantages and disadvantages of incorporation in a number point bullet form?
Lozg wrote: » Criminal Question- Is it ok to leave out the procedural part of the course or would I be better off doing it?
tommytimber wrote: » CRIMINAL Any suggestions on essays for tomorrow?
fe12020oct wrote: » any predictions for equity??