BorneTobyWilde wrote: » People are dreaming, CNN trying to not declare anything, lets just squeeze another few hours, another few minutes with this dream of winning. Tears in their eyes. It's done, Trump won, and got more votes than last time.
Loughc wrote: » Honest question here, I honestly don't have a clue nor do I pretend to, how can it go either way, from what I can see Trump is leading in most of the larger remaining electoral votes states, will that not be enough to push him over the line? I can only see Biden ahead in NV, WI, AZ, which are low enough electoral votes.
nc6000 wrote: » Really? Who should we be watching then?
Brian? wrote: » Anyone with this level of certainty has no clue what they’re talking about. It can go either way.
Christy42 wrote: » Give DC senators. Reps should figure out how to win big cities. I get Republicans seem to not like Democrats voting but it is weird that there are US citizens not at all represented in the senate.
Kiith wrote: » Because they would vote blue.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Why do citizens of DC not get to elect Senators, and what about Puerto Rico?
Hawkeye9212 wrote: » Statehood for DC is stupid. Dems should just figure out how to win in rural states again.
Deleted User wrote: » Why do citizens of DC not get to elect Senators, and what about Puerto Rico?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Republicans have an in built advantage in the senate. Overall if every state was to run Senate elections on the same night, ,they would probably need to win at least 53-47 on national basis to win a majority of seats. The fact that this advantage was once in favour of the Democrats is irrelevant, its bad for democracy. A simple step could be taken to correct it however - Statehood for DC and Puerto Rico. No way the republicans would allow this however, disenfranchising large numbers of US citizens is one of their key values at this stage
Hawkeye9212 wrote: » The Senate isn't ridiculous. Dems used to win seats in rural states but then they decided to swing left and lose all of it.
TP_CM wrote: » Christ Bonnie!
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » I'm just saying it's done, same way the polls had Trump far far behind in PA, MH,OH. His path is so much easier right now, while yesterday Biden had 400 paths, and Trump has 3. Exaggerated , but you get me.
deathbomber wrote: » Trumps little accusational speech earlier really seals it for me, they know, Biden has to have it
BonnieSituation wrote: » We have a whole thread devoted to Trump that's in its 12th iteration and he's done so much good that you've never darkened its door to tell us all about it. Amazing how the rats have suddenly returned to the ship in the last couple of hours.
MJohnston wrote: » Where are you seeing that? I thought they were done counting for the day
seamus wrote: » I doubt it. That side of the aisle just don't have that in them. Trump lost 2016 by nearly 3m votes and there was barely a whimper. Trump could lose by 10m votes, take the electoral college and Democrats would say, "Our system is a farce, but I'm still going to respect the outcome because it's our system". If the Supreme Court stopped the count and Trump secured the White House using military force, the Democrats would eventually make some noises about accepting the outcome of the courts and moving on. On the other side of the aisle, if Biden took the White House despite losing the popular vote by a few thousand votes, there'd be armed lunatics in the streets claiming fraud, claiming the election had been stolen and claiming that it's a coup by the Democrats. This is functionally the problem. One side continually takes the "play by the rules, stand by your principles" stance, the other lies, cheats and steals every chance it can get. You cannot win a game when you're the only person playing by the rules.
Brian? wrote: » Pennsylvania starting to tighten.
elefant wrote: » Nobody gets you, this is all nonsense. Are you trolling?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/5117ec177439400b1e5944f4d30acdda.svg)
