MJohnston wrote: » No it’s not it’s been rollercoastering all night! That alone should tell you that it’s a reflector of the race not a predictor.
thefridge2006 wrote: » Its a very very good indicator .........
bennyl10 wrote: » And Biden is still slight favourite to take Georgia I dont see who the Trump supporters can in any way claim victory at this stage?
bennyl10 wrote: » not according to the NYThttps://twitter.com/reidepstein/status/1323924773840343041?s=20
thefridge2006 wrote: » Yes and the whole thing was a rollercoaster.... so they were right.......
Brian? wrote: » Is Biden fav for Georgia? I don’t see it
Quin_Dub wrote: » It is still all to play for , but once it hits the court rooms , who knows how it might end up.
Larbre34 wrote: » WI: Trump is +100k, but there are 700k votes still to count
Larbre34 wrote: » WI: Trump is +100k, but there are 700k votes still to count PA: Trump is +700k, but 1.8m to count MI: Trump is +300k, but 1.8m to count NC: Trump is +77k, but 300k to count GA: Trump is +100k, but 450k to count Keep in mind, those are mostly early/mail votes that favour Biden.
Larbre34 wrote: » The Supreme Court doesn't worry me, they'll adopt the same logic as we've seen in the lower courts, 'if the votes are there, count them all' Besides, I'm quite sure the learned jurists of the SC would be quite happy to see the back of a threat to the Constitution like Trump, even the members he appointed. Frankly, they can protect a conservative position on matters before them irrespective of whether he is President.
el Fenomeno wrote: » What can Trump's play be in court - challenge the legitimacy of the mail in numbers, claim fraud somewhere? Will he need to have evidence of that (and will he have it)? Sorry, just curious as to what happens with the threat of the Supreme Court from Trump.