Exclamation Marc wrote: » Only 31% of the early vote has been counted in Ohio.
Limpy wrote: » The boom will be back big time in America with Trump getting 4 more years. The voters agree.
virginmediapls wrote: » Regardless of who eventually stutters to victory here, it's a ****ing damning indictment on the population of the USA that this orange gowl got so many votes.
Francie Barrett wrote: » He isn't likely to lose any of them. Biden has some leads thanks to the early votes being counted first, but he's getting eaten alive as the counts go on. Biden is looking like he HAS to win Wis/Mich/Penn now.
Exclamation Marc wrote: » Well that was quick 180.
breezy1985 wrote: » Biden is losing Ohio now
J2CVC wrote: » Man you're way out on this. Bookmakers follow the exchanges. They're all the same. If they're not people can hedge bets and guarantee a profit. Believe me the betting market is the best indicator you will find.
Brian? wrote: » I think I'm so upset because it’s so close. 13000 vote lead for Biden in Ohio now. Biden isn’t winning there.
Shelga wrote: » I couldn't give a s**t about some working class white man in Pennsylvania whingeing because he's not the centre of the universe anymore. I care about Trump pulling them out of the Paris Agreement. The fact that this is remotely close is just horrific. Think I'll go to bed.
StringerBell wrote: » Exactly, so people should probably relax a little and not get too worked up, what it does seem to be guaranteed now that Biden couldn't take Florida is that this isn't going to be called tonight.
Inquitus wrote: » Aye Trump is going to hold everything up to Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which is where this will be decided, I have to admit I am rather pessimistic at this point.
murpho999 wrote: » Trump can only afford to lose a couple of states that he won in 2016 and that's what they're pointing out.
FatRat wrote: » If you don't understand these betting markets you shouldn't comment in them, they are as close to perfect information as you can get [...] Granted this could still change, it's probability based and we are working with imperfect information.
murpho999 wrote: » No he shouldn't as it's simply too early. Results not in from the key swing states that were always expected to be close.
marno21 wrote: » This is a complete mess when we don't know what proportion of what States' votes are early/mail in. Look at Virginia - no way that's how it'll finish up.