nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

US Presidential Election 2020 Thread II - Judgement Day(s)

Quin_Dub

Continuation thread from here

All existing rules still stand.

Everyone will want to be active in this thread over the next few days , but there will be zero tolerance for Forum rule breaches.

Keep it Sensible , Civil and Polite please.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

StringerBell

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Anyone got good sites for live results. As in just the data. CNN are doing my head in focussing on Florida.

Can watch on BBC sky fox NBC abc PBS Al Jazeera etc etc etc just change the channel surely is the option there?

[Deleted User]

listermint wrote: »

No they're reporting the figures as they come in.

Just because you don't like that doesn't make it less factual.

In fact I would say youd give out about it if CNN were making up stuff..

They literally called Massachusetts when the polls closed before any votes were in. Are you watching it like?

Blanco100

Are CNN taking the piss with Florida?

Not a single mention that theres more chance of the pope getting pregnant than the panhandle turning blue

ACitizenErased

Biden set to take Williamson County (Austin, TX suburb). With 95% reporting:

Biden 50.6
Trump 47.4

Trump took this county by about 10% in 2016– this would be a double digit swing.

Carfacemandog

Deleted User wrote: »

Anyone got good sites for live results. As in just the data. CNN are doing my head in focussing on Florida.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/results-president.html

J2CVC

Bookies results are the clearest sign, the exchanges especially.

Almost €400 million has been matched on the market on Betfair. Experts move this market, not punters. If something significant happens somewhere this is the first place you'll see it.

Biden still favourite but less so than he was in the last few days. Currently:

Joe: 1.81
Donald: 2.22

murpho999

Blanco100 wrote: »

last president to be elected whilst losing Florida?

Clinton - 92

Big Pussy Bonpensiero

Kiith wrote: »

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2020/nov/03/us-election-2020-live-results-donald-trump-joe-biden-who-won-presidential-republican-democrat

According to this only half the votes in Miami-Dade have been counted?
Am I reading that right?

Itssoeasy

Blanco100 wrote: »

Are CNN taking the piss with Florida?

Not a single mention that theres more chance of the pope getting pregnant than the panhandle turning blue

MSNBC are going to Texas and Ohio and it’s great. Florida is just one state.

StringerBell

[Deleted User] wrote: »

They literally called Massachusetts when the polls closed before any votes were in. Are you watching it like?

Some states are safe, some aren't. They have been burned on Florida before and Florida is always a rollercoaster so they will get their money's worth out of it.

Outlaw Pete

Betting getting closer on the Exchange: Biden now 4/5 ish (1.79) on Betfair and Trump 5/4 ish (2.27).

Thinking Texas won't be as tight as Florida but the numbers currently looking like it could be:

https://twitter.com/RitaPanahi/status/1323796277138771975

Francie Barrett

I think everything will end up hinging on Pennsylvania.

murpho999

Francie Barrett wrote: »

I am sorry, but crushed is the correct term. The US is having to deal with an economy that is in a mess with covid wreaking havoc. For Biden to actually lose Florida by more votes than a deeply unpopular candidate like Hillary is disastrous.

How can you say Trump (as much as I don't like him) is unpopular if he's won Florida.

He's clearly very popular. That's why he won in 2016.

[Deleted User]

Widdensushi wrote: »

If it was the other way would you watch it?

Eh? I want just the relevant numbers.

StringerBell wrote: »

Can watch on BBC sky fox NBC abc PBS Al Jazeera etc etc etc just change the channel surely is the option there?

I don't want to spend half an hour seeing which channel is showing mostly numbers. Apparently BBC have talking heads mostly, that's not what I'm after.

Itssoeasy

ACitizenErased wrote: »

Biden set to take Williamson County (Austin, TX suburb). With 95% reporting:

Biden 50.6
Trump 47.4

Trump took this county by about 10% in 2016– this would be a double digit swing.

Maybe the democrats weren’t nuts going there late in the campaign. They must have seen something.

Inquitus

I am going to grab a couple of hours sleep, this is going to be a fair old wait.

timeToLive

Blanco100 wrote: »

Are CNN taking the piss with Florida?

Not a single mention that theres more chance of the pope getting pregnant than the panhandle turning blue

What are you watching? They're being very clear who won what in 2016 and the difference now.

murpho999

Blanco100 wrote: »

Are CNN taking the piss with Florida?

Not a single mention that theres more chance of the pope getting pregnant than the panhandle turning blue

No network has called it.

I'd say due to what happened there before and it's close.

StringerBell

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Eh? I want just the relevant numbers.

I don't want to spend half an hour seeing which channel is showing mostly numbers. Apparently BBC have talking heads mostly, that's not what I'm after.

I'd say one of the newspapers then nyt or wapo seem to be pretty good at updating the figures fast.

Francie Barrett

murpho999 wrote: »

How can you say Trump (as much as I don't like him) is unpopular if he's won Florida.

He's clearly very popular. That's why he won in 2016.

I didn't mention Trump

marno21

Am I missing something? Biden up 300k in Ohio with no reporting from Cincinnati or Cleveland? 42% counted?

Larbre34

I'm on a twitter live chat with Bradley Whitford as he watches the results come in. He's in Canada filming.

Quite surreal to be interacting with Josh Lyman on election night

StupidLikeAFox

CNN should use blue or red stripes for states that are still being counted. Texas was completely blue then when they zoomed in there was one blue and one red district - silly stuff that could easily be sorted

moby2101

Deleted User wrote: »

Anyone got good sites for live results. As in just the data. CNN are doing my head in focussing on Florida.

Bloomberg seems right there

[Deleted User]

StringerBell wrote: »

Some states are safe, some aren't. They have been burned on Florida before and Florida is always a rollercoaster so they will get their money's worth out of it.

Florida is now safe so they should bloody move on.

Biden still 11 points up, 45% counted in Ohio. Looks good.

Carfacemandog

marno21 wrote: »

Am I missing something? Biden up 300k in Ohio with no reporting from Cincinnati or Cleveland? 42% counted?

42% is counted from Cleveland, but you're right - none from Cincinnati yet which is a little surprising.

Larbre34

marno21 wrote: »

Am I missing something? Biden up 300k in Ohio with no reporting from Cincinnati or Cleveland? 42% counted?

Those results are suburban counties of the big towns you mention.

Faugheen

Early indications look much better for Biden in NC

Itssoeasy

Connecticut goes to Biden per MSNBC.

[Deleted User]

marno21 wrote: »

Am I missing something? Biden up 300k in Ohio with no reporting from Cincinnati or Cleveland? 42% counted?

Yeah they're really missing the story.

Here's 2 links posted before with live results. Ohio and North Carolina the ones to watch, if they're blue it's all good for Biden.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2020/nov/03/us-election-2020-live-results-donald-trump-joe-biden-who-won-presidential-republican-democrat

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/results-president.html