HU123 wrote: » What do you mean you will be flagged? I could not get logged for the first 20 minutes today either so didn't get my last question finished. I raised this with the law society and also got sent a link to finish it I which I now have.
Red.95 wrote: » Hi guys.. Is this happening for a lot of people? Will your questions change now or be the same as the ones you saw then the exam was open. I understand the timing is so unfair being cut short but it's also quite unfair if people are being given 20 mins to finish a question this evening having read it today..
LeGal97 wrote: » Have you clicked the link? I just did there for the craic to see and it said I had an exam to be taken, and then when I clicked that it said I have no exam to take. So I'm guessing the link expired? This is a shambles!
shaunadennyham wrote: » Surely they won’t change the questions you couldn’t expect someone to finish a q in 20 minutes. Arguably unfair that people had technical issues which would have thrown them for their other answers. We’re not competing against each other as I don’t think they use a bell curve so it should be fine
awsah wrote: » It would be hard to see how they could fail anyone after the shambles today, I missed out on 10 minutes if I fail I can argue that and so many other people can too!! People asking about winding up i have some condensed notes done up if you pm me. I'm looking for stuff on the changes in 2014 act if someone can help me out!
HU123 wrote: » Yes I clicked it when I did it said it was only available to 6pm, so maybe that's why it's not appearing anymore. I know it really is and has really added to the stress, now im worried I shouldn't have clicked it if you are saying it gets flagged.
LeGal97 wrote: » Is anyone else's exam now showing up as not taken? I also got a link for more time as I emailed and said my timer was short a few minutes and I got an email and a link to finish it which I did not want to do, I just wanted it to be logged. Now no one is answering the phone. It used to say awaiting feedback and now I am terrified its all gone, but if I click the link and use the time I will be flagged. Help!!
Iso_123 wrote: » Hey wondering if anyone covered the circumstances where a floating charge crystallizes for tomorrow? I know it came up in march so I was gona leave it out but getting stressed now because I can only answer 4 questions on some papers with my topics including last march paper but with that added it would be 5.. any suggestions on last min topics to throw in?
StabiloLaw wrote: » Send me your email and I can give you some info on Changes to the Act! I've got Winding Up also if anyone needs it but they're not exactly concise...
awsah wrote: » what topics are you doing?
Iso_123 wrote: » I have: Directors including duties, sec 238/239 fraudulent and reckless trading restriction share/share transfer 212/foss v harbottle winding up realisation of assets (602/604/608) slp and incorporation/sec 31 contracts corporate borrowing (except where floating charge crystallizes essay) authority
rickmatt wrote: » Hi guys just on word count, I've noticed when I type up my answers I am only roughly getting a page in, roughly 400-450 words per answer. I know that when I would be actual writing an answer in the answer booklets I'd easily clear 3-5 pages. Not sure if this is something that is taken into account but it just looks like I'm writing so little, anyone else notice or is it a cause for concern??? Quality over Quantity and all that
Healyjhow wrote: » Just wondering if anyone used a monitor for today’s exam? Or is there rules against this ? My laptop is tiny just wondering if the option to use a monitor connected to a laptop is there
awsah wrote: » The rules say you cannot have two screens so I am sure this would fall under that?
fe12020oct wrote: » anyone know what aspect of corp borrowing is most/least likely to appear tomorrow?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w7.vanillicon.com/v2/7daf49054e3af6fd63581ea964be3447.svg)
