steveeq wrote: » Courtney generally copies between two-three questions from the second and third last paper, I.e. October & Mar 2019. Rule out the ones he’s already copied in Mar 2020 and that’ll leave you with a few bankers I think. S.238/239, advantages/disadvantages of incorporation (which includes SLP), examinership etc. He blatantly copies and pastes, doesn’t even change the name of the people involved sometimes.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Thank you! Shareholder protection would be focused on oppression/s212 mainly is it? I have a few points of 2014 reforms as a back up thanks so some kind soul on here! What would be best to focus on to narrow down winding up?
Red.95 wrote: » Do they let you back into the exam after you've had time to view the questions? It all seems very messy
CiaranS93 wrote: » Just talked to them 10 mins ago they are waiting for better exams to get back to them but she said I will be able to finish it today. Yea she all but told me to go look over my notes while I wait. Doesn't matter as I had 4 questions done pretty well but just want to get the last one done now because this is my last FE1 and of course this happens 😂
CiaranS93 wrote: » Just talked to them 10 mins ago they are waiting for better exams to get back to them but she said I will be able to finish it today. Yea she all but told me to go look over my notes while I wait. Doesn't matter as I had 4 questions done pretty well but just want to get the last one done now because this is my last FE1 and of course this happens ��
Buttonbean123 wrote: » Does any kind soul out there have a sample answer for the problem Q for s238 & S239 transactions that they could share please?
law_struggles wrote: » For vicarious Q was car dealership vicariously liable for injuries to Kevin? Junior surgeon or hospital liable re medical neg?
ruby1998 wrote: » Lol did anyone do the intentional torts Q and compensation I made a total balls of it
fe12020oct wrote: » COMPANY is there much point at looking at s117 directors duty re distributions or would it be better to focus on 228/238/239 and who directors owe a duty to??? appreciate any help !
Fe1new4 wrote: » Wait what? I only got in at half 10, didn’t get finished. Rang afterwards pretty upset tbh, and they said they’d take it into consideration but no offer to let me finish? I’d feel pretty hard done by if I don’t pass yet others got the chance to go back in? That’s very inconsistent application of the rules
law_struggles wrote: » But for test for trampoline q?
Philodendron wrote: » Were people asked to show the room during the exam?
htnor wrote: » Is there a word count for you in the mock exam? I saw it in the generic practice test but the mock exams from law society don't seem to have word count, for me anyway.
legallyginger wrote: » Just wondering was there a word count today?
WesternC123 wrote: » No there wasn't!
LeGal97 wrote: » Is anyone else's exam now showing up as not taken? I also got a link for more time as I emailed and said my timer was short a few minutes and I got an email and a link to finish it which I did not want to do, I just wanted it to be logged. Now no one is answering the phone. It used to say awaiting feedback and now I am terrified its all gone, but if I click the link and use the time I will be flagged. Help!!
Costello95 wrote: » Does anyone have anything concise on winding up? Cramming to the max now and getting stressed out! Thanks
rickmatt wrote: » Hi, anybody sitting Company tomorrow see Betterexaminations page says our exam will be open for 1 hour... Not trying to scare anyone but I'm sure there's nothing wrong and it will probably be fine but want to make sure I'm not the only one.
HU123 wrote: » What do you mean you will be flagged? I could not get logged for the first 20 minutes today either so didn't get my last question finished. I raised this with the law society and also got sent a link to finish it I which I now have.