Kenkashin wrote: » Are people going to use the toilet? I am not sure whether to just not drink water throughout the exam.
EmmaO94 wrote: » I imagine the fact that legislation is allowed will obviously be taken into consideration re us flicking through it & scanning it a lot, but as someone said earlier no harm in holding it up to the camera every so often to show that everything's above board!
shaunadennyham wrote: » I’m extremely worried about this - I know it’s irrational but I just worry that they’ll flag me for suspicious behaviour even if I do show the leg and I’ll be left trying to prove that I didn’t cheat after the fact which is impossible
moeby wrote: » Does anyone have upcoming exams on the BetterExaminations website? I still have nothing there. I am sure its fine but just want to double check. Thanks
Fe119 wrote: » I think that comes across as suspicious, why bother if you're not asked
IgoPAP wrote: » You would think they would allow us to bring the Irish Constitution into any exams as it has relevance in so many subjects.
TheLawGuy wrote: » TORT I know Tort is extremely difficult to predict but is there anything major that I should add to the below list? Negligence (DOC,SOC,Causation,Remoteness) Defamation Damages Occupiers Nuisance/RvF Trespass to the person Vicarious Liability Pure Economic Loss Neg Misstatement Liability for Animals Any advice would be appreciated
ihatethesea wrote: » I have exactly the same as you but I added Defamation and Employers Liability last minute! Defamation is big but it comes up a lot it would be too risky too leave I think! I dropped Liability for Animals after some advice on here
HU123 wrote: » I would also add professional negligence and affirmative duties if you have time. There's been some recent SC cases in those areas and neither came up in the August papers.
ruby1998 wrote: » Hey, what are the recent cases for affirmative duties, if you don't mind sharing?
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » Property - Is there anybody that could help with equity and notice please? Struggling to understand the use foefee etc
Fe123 wrote: » What are people studying for contract and or equity
HU123 wrote: » No problem, for omissions there is the UCC v ESB case which you can also use for liability of public authorities.
shaunadennyham wrote: » Don’t think that comes up much I’m not covering it
CoconutHeadMia wrote: » Okay perfect, what are you planning on covering?