jimmii wrote: » Tough gig to get into I think. There seem to be a few in each area marketing, membership, sales etc that dominate and would be hard to convince people to switch imo. I'm helping out a crm switch at the moment and it's been a massive pain in the ass! If you're focusing on smaller companies then you'd be up against zoho a lot of the time and that would be a tough one to be butting heads with especially micros with just a couple of guys on the road who can get away with the free plan.
ViperMAN wrote: » I completely agree. Zoho was one of the systems we used. To be fair its a descent platform. We used the CRM, Projects and Books modules. Projects is far too complicated for our needs. Not very intuitive and and far too many features for us. I guess I need to figure out if building a feature light, super easy to use system makes sense. I don't think it will be possible to topple the big players - but if there was enough of a slice of the pie it might be worth it.
jimmii wrote: » Then I'd think going more niche might be the best option. For example I know some people in marketing who have really struggled to find a good option at the right price. They're using marketeer now but it doesn't do everything they want.
ViperMAN wrote: » Thanks Jimmii. I think you are spot on about going more niche. I just checked out marketeer - it does have a specific set of features that makes it niche. I guess solving our problems and productising might be a good approach.
gargargar wrote: » You would have a lot of competition, however that shouldn't necessarily stop you as it is a huge market. I would really research what you would going up against and why you would be different. If you think you see a differentiator then research again and see if it is enough. The odds will be against you but look at teamwork the Irish guys who built a project mgt tool. Went into a busy market with some serious competition and have build a product worth 100s of millions.
jamesbondings wrote: » I currently work in this industry, consider integrations open APIS. Partners - who will ensure successful implementation of your product? - cost of implementation (in my experience) can sometime outweigh the actual cost of the product. Competition - currently rife.......smaller guys like zoho are just the tip of the iceberg, salesforce, oracle, microsoft all have solutions that can easily be made affordable if speaking to a sales rep. Then you have to consider support - have you funds for a full time team to be on call to help clients with any issues they may face? There are organisations that have a crm app specifically tailored to reps on the road/engineers on the road etc...... What is your USP? Is it cost? quality will be a hard one to sell as a new business with no reference-ability. Is it the fact it has open API's and can seemlessly integrate with other vendors solutions for ERP, Marketing etc? Hope this is food for thought PM me if i can be of any additional support!
onedmc wrote: » I'd agree, any of the CRM system that I looked at are either too complicated or dont do what I want. I run a training business and ended up building my own access database and interacting it into a standard CRM system for marketing. So I believe that there is plenty of opportunity for new CRM's but they must be niche to particular sectors and be able to do more than standard CRM by replicating the niches particular processes easily. For me its feedback, attendance records, certification, skills etc. Maybe the niche is CRM+officeERM
ViperMAN wrote: » Hey, thanks for your response! Much appreciated! Actually, you touched on an open question I have. You mention APIs/integrations and the like - for a small business, do you think that this is vital? When our company has signed up to a new CRM, we didn't use integrations into other various apps, we don't use APIs and we didn't have the need to copy data into the new CRM. We just started using it. I guess we are small so we didn't really need these features. I suppose I want to emphasis that the idea is to cut out features. This will make it easier to use, but also easier for me to create and therefore cheaper to sell. My current thinking is that this makes sense. But maybe I am simplifying it too much. As for support, its a cost effective app so support will be email only. I am not thinking of the scale of salesforce, etc. But again, maybe I am simplifying things too much and the reality will be different. USP will be cost and ease of use. The feature set will be greatly reduced. I understand that won't suit a lot of companies - but that is okay for me as long as there is some slice of the market. All feedback welcome!
BnB wrote: » ViperMan - I was looking for the exact same thing as you. A CRM that cuts out all the BS. We were using Zoho - And while you can't argue that it is a bad system, it is just so big and complex that it has become almost unusable as just a simple CRM. By just needing a CRM, we were probably only using 5% of the total system. It was bad enough that we were paying for everything else, but the bigger problem was the key things we needed were often buried under 2 or 3 sub menus. After using it for 2 years I went looking around again at the end of last year and I ended up going back to an Irish Company that I had looked at in the first place OnePageCRM. This is an old fashioned CRM system - Who are my leads - What potential deals do I have in place - What are the next actions I need to take. We are using it for 6 months now and we're very happy with it. Before you go writing something yourself, I think it might be worth having a look at them