lizcarolan wrote: » I was out walking my dog on the country road around my house and I turned left up a road. It's about 800m long. I walked up to first house and turned back around. Anyway the women of the house came out to me and was extremely rude to me. She told me off for walking on the road as it's a private road. I told her there is no sign stating this anywhere. Can anyone tell me what is the legal stance on this.
Purple Mountain wrote: » It's probably a private lane way up to her house and land.
macsauce wrote: » My family home is on a long private road and we also have people walking their dog on our lane. If you are on someone else’s property they have every right to be rude to you. They are not obliged to put up any notices on their property to say it is private property. It is up to YOU to make sure you don’t go where you don’t belong. It is extremely annoying when people walk their dog on your property, don’t clean up after their pets and their pets then annoy either owners pets (or livestock if it’s a farm).
the hedgeman wrote: » If she said it was a private lane,you'll have to take her word for it and accept it
buffalo wrote: » Related, is there an easy way to find online what's actually a private road and what's not? There's a cul de sac near me with a sign saying 'private road' on it, but there's about 7 houses along it, fully tarmacked with council streetlights. I'm pretty sure prior to the motorway being built that it was a through road
yurtyaherne wrote: » Majority of public roads would have a sign at a junction entering it with a road number. .
Donald Trump wrote: » Usually the land under the road is technically privately owned. Not always, but usually. There is usually just an established right of way there. The local council will maintain such roads. If the lane is of similar quality to the road, then that might be an indication that the council maintain it which might indicate there is an established public right of way The council won't maintain the ones which are private. I reckon that for a cul-de-sac there could be a good chance it is private. If it is open on both end, then probably public. The above is just my understanding and could be wrong.If you look on landdirect.ie you might see ROW registered on a lane etc. It will be marked in yellow. If you see that then that would be definite proof it is not a public ROW. The absence of that would not indicate the opposite though
John_Rambo wrote: » That's interesting, thanks. Confirmed, my in-laws road is private.
Donald Trump wrote: » Obviously though, if there is only one house on the lane and that owner also own all the land/gates along the lane, then there isn't going to be a ROW registered. Because it's just a long driveway then. The ROW would be needed for others who need access along that lane but who do not own it, or at least do not own the entire length of it and there is no general public ROW. If there is a public ROW then there would be no need to register a specific one. That is just my own logic and not a rule. I don't know what technically constitutes a general public ROW....I am guessing it is just established over time and for as long as it is being used it will continue to exist as such.
ganmo wrote: » Having lived on a road like this it's so much easier to be an ass yo people that think they can go where ever the f they want dispite a gate and signs. If I feel like being polite I'll ask where they think they're going before telling them to turn around. These days people will try their luck and only stop if stopped so that colours my view on this
listermint wrote: » Read the OPs post, - There is NO gate, No signs, the road looks like any other around the area. It might be so much easier to be an arsehole. But it doesnt make you right. If someone is that pissed off about 'trespass' then the should have it legitimately sign posted at the start of the entrance otherwise passing traffic or footwalkers would have every inclination to take the route. People are not mind readers.
ganmo wrote: » But they are map readers
beauf wrote: » So if it's not marked as private on the version of a map a person is using then it's ok to use it?