baloo21 wrote: » Pres. of innocence Arrest Bail Court jurisdiction
FE1Pleb wrote: » For criminal what procedural questions came up in March? and what are people focussing on this time round? The syllabus is absolutely massive - starting to panic. Thanks
Fe123 wrote: » How do property rights play into it? Never would have thought that despite studying the chapter
Creol1 wrote: » In Re Article 26 and the Health (Amendment)(No 2) Bill 2004 the proposed legislation was held by the Supreme Court to be unconstitutional as preventing potential plaintiffs from suing to recover money was an unjust attack on property rights.
law_struggles wrote: » anybody got a tort sample answer with a good ILAC structure, please?
Hazel774 wrote: » I'm not doing tort this sitting, so I'm not 100%, but maybe: Children - just have 1-2 cases Concurrent wrongdoers - just know the basic rules Animals - just the basic rules (or leave it out)Tort in August (physical sitting) was: Res Ipsa (essay) Causation/Trespass/ Nuisance/RvF/ Fire PQ Trespass to the person (Intentional Infliction of Emotional harm) Passing Off Defamation Liability for Defective Products PQ involving Negligence (DOC/ SOC/ Causation/ Remoteness) and Liability for children Limitation Periods (essay)
awsah wrote: » Hi, would anyone have suggestions on what I could reasonably cut from this list for tort (perhaps something that was asked in march/aug as not on my grid) or perhaps I would need to keep them all... -DOC/SOC -Causation - professional negligence - concurrent wrongdoer - products liability - vicarious liability - occupiers liability - negligent misstatement - affirmative duties - negligent care of children - liability for animals - defamation - nervous shock - passing off - trespass to the person - Nuisance
baloo21 wrote: » I'd say property rights and SOP
kayleee123 wrote: » I'd definitely look at Buckley v AG, State (O) v O'Brien and State (McEldowney) v Kelleher for SOP caselaw on this q I have notes on these if you need them just pm me
hullaballoo wrote: » Separation of powers, access to justice, equality, bodily integrity off the top of my head. I'll have a think about it and see are there any more.
Lawlaw12 wrote: » Someone posted in the FB group today that they ordered from OPW 2 days ago and were told that they are still taking orders for FE1 candidates, and someone else emailed on Tuesday (publications@opw.ie) and the OPW rang them on Wednesday and took their order. What subjects are you doing this sitting? If you can't get through to opw someone might have the legislation you need, but definitely send them an email this evening and see if they get back to you
Hazel774 wrote: » Does anyone know what Q 8 of the March 2020 paper was asking about for constitutional?
Iso_123 wrote: » For property law are people covering adverse possession on leasehold land too or is this a waste of time?
QUESTION EIGHT Rachel suffered a serious injury as a result of negligence of a driver who crashed into her parents’ car. The medical advice is that she will suffer long-term consequences and will require expensive medical care for at least 40 years. It is unclear how much these costs may be but they have been loosely estimated at €500,000 per annum (or €20m over 40 years). The driver was insured so that there are, in principle, funds available to discharge these costs. Rachel has initiated a claim in negligence before the courts. Before her case is heard, the Oireachtas enacts the Capping of Insurance Costs Acts 2020. Section 1 of the Act provides that it applies “to all actions currently in being and subsequently initiated before the courts”. Section 4 of the Act imposes a maximum cap on damages in a claim involving personal injuries of €10m. Rachel’s guardian has asked you for the legal advice as to whether there are grounds of Irish constitutional law upon which she might challenge the Act, Advise her.
orlaghs wrote: » Thank you for this! Turns out the OPW is closed until Dec 1st - if anyone has any advice for me it would be much appreciated. Clear issue with people printing their own that include notes etc, so very unsure about what to do. Extremely frustrating not being able to get an answer/clear instructions from LS.
Lovestolisten wrote: » Sorry to harp on about this but has everyone received their log in's from Betterexaminations? I have nothing, No link for the practice yesterday or two weeks ago, no username or password to log in next week, no email from anyone about anything except to say I am registered. This will be my last three so I'll crack up of I can't get them done
