Ace2007 wrote: » Not sure if it's set but for GW9 there are 6 games listed as Saturday 3pm kick off - no idea if that is subject to change?
Chesty08 wrote: » It’s gonna be very hard to see it going back to normal times. To be honest the Saturday & Sunday night games are golden.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I do think it is a little easier right but deffo less fun. Like even without watching all. The games I pay attention to them singularly so it is making things clearer for me. I always try to catch my attacking players. So if I can I will be trying for ones in more attacking teams if possible. So that'll be no woods or Wilsons for me this year hopefully
Shanotheslayer wrote: » Tbh I like it. I get to watch more football and I get to see more players if they pass the eye test. If anything it's easier(Assuming you get to see the games)
Cartman78 wrote: » These four day gameweeks are great craic said no one ever
Dr. Bre wrote: » I miss the 3pm games
Shedite27 wrote: » 4pm Friday deadline for GW8 (next week). That will have a fair few casualties!
NabyLadistheman wrote: » If I have 2 free transfers and don't use any will I still have 2 next week? Just burn the one transfer?
Ace2007 wrote: » Well the simple question is why don't Liverpool have a player at the same moment in their career as Tuanzebe, or an experienced centre back on the bench. It's not as if Klopp took over the squad this season and hasn't had time to get back up if he doesn't believe the youth are ready yet.
yourdeadwright wrote: » Williams won't play against Westham I'm convinced of it , Pointless comparing the situation to Tuanzebe totally different moments in there careers Even Tuanzebe might struggle in the position Williams is being asked to play , United played 3 CB and the wing back was AWB who's know for defending so Tuanzebe had plenty of quality around him , Williams will be right of 2 CB's and his right back Trent will be much further forward, Liverpool will have to look to see who in there squad will cope best with strong counter attack runs in that channel and play whoever fits the bill , Could be Hendo or could even be Gini ,
Irishphotodesk wrote: » Is it not a bit kneejerk to think he will be off penalties after hitting the post, it wasn't a bad penalty, he was just unlucky, and he was off the pitch when Werner took the next penalty. It's possible that Werner may be 2nd in line... But there's no guarantee that jorginho will be a starter for the whole season
Father Hernandez wrote: » https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/12117396/frank-lampard-chelsea-manager-to-discuss-penalty-taker-options-after-jorginho-miss Something to ponder for Jorginho owners.
Frank Lampard: Chelsea manager to discuss penalty-taker options after Jorginho miss
Ace2007 wrote: » Regarding Antonio - is he not injured - came off at weekend with something - hamstring maybe?
Morzadec wrote: » Really can't compare Rhys Williams to Tuanzebe though. Williams is 19 and you can see from his body that he's not fully filled out yet. Tuanzebe is 22, a fully grown man, looks very strong. Tuanzebe has also played a decent bit of Championship football, Rhys Williams was playing in the conference just a couple of months ago. I would worry for him physically with Antonio, I think he'll eat him alive, it really literally would be "men against boys" in that matchup. It's not slight on him at all from Klopp to be benched for Henderson, which I think will ultimately happen if Matip can't play. Could be a good day for Antonio, will be difficult for Liverpool if Matip is out.
Ace2007 wrote: » The thing thought with saying that Rhys Williams looks good is that - instead of playing him there in the past, he's put in Fabinho - which doesn't give great confidence in the young lad. You have United throwing in Tuanzebe for a game against PSG for instance. I brought up the subject of Pool's defense weeks ago and they just don't have any back up of any real quality if there are injures. Man City/Chelsea/United have numerous defenders (not all can handle the pressure or are trusted, but they know the position), whereas with Pool, it's TAA, VVD, Gomez/Matip and Robbo - Ignore Milner and Fabino as they are mids. All we've seen really is Nico Williams who looks like a rabbit in headlights when he's played. If Klopp does play Henderson as others believe, it will be even worse for the young lad - as what would need to happen for him to play. Playing Henderson in CB will weaken their midfield - although it may allow Jota more game time as he is a worker. Hopefully though whoever plays will help them keep CS.
Dearg81 wrote: » Fabinho hurt his hamstring so might miss the West Ham and possibly City game if its bad. The young lad is Rhys Williams, he looks good but I'd be worried Antonio could be too strong for him.
Ace2007 wrote: » On another note - Fabiano injury may lead to random lad playing in central defence - will be tough keeping double pool defence.
Fitz* wrote: » Milner has looked really leggy in the last 2 midweek games and is showing his age now. 35 in January. I don't think he can start back to back games in midfield, let alone do back to back 90s. He could do a job for a game alright at LB but that creates another problem. It would leave just Wijnaldum & Curtis Jones as the only fit CMs (as Henderson will be viewed as a CB for now). Ox I think won't be seen for a good few months yet either. Until Keita & Thiago regain match fitness, this issue is going to persist. It looks like Henderson could be having a run of games at CB now to me anyways. With the midfield and shape of the team having heavy rotation to try and protect the players who are available and can fill in at CB & CM.
shineon23 wrote: » Milner can play left back, he did consistently a few seasons ago.
Fitz* wrote: » That's more of a back 3 though and anyways the reserve Liverpool LB Tsimikas is also injured so Robertson is needed to pay LB.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/2166e486d2270e36003cd1b3e3519b24.svg)
