spook_cook wrote: » Yeah, I've seen more and more on the rounds. The political ones usually just ally to the person's own politics, but seeing a lot of: - Melania is dead/is a double. - Boris's baby doesn't exist (that rabbit hole is hilarious). - Russia is behind <literally_anything> Then you've the ones on corona and the great reset. Which oddly is on the cover of Time, which must drive CTers nuts. And then a lot of ones I think are derived from the Epstein case involving world leaders and human trafficing. I wanna say they're all nuts. But you would have said that a while ago about the spying on everyone in the West, UFOs...
OMM 0000 wrote: The pair were struck off as solicitors in 2018 for matters completely separate to this garda investigation.
jackboy wrote: » If anyone was told a year ago that soon people will be banned from going from relatives funerals that would have been one of the most lunatic conspiracy theories going, yet here we are.
The_Brood wrote: » I have no information about covid being man made... But how in the world do you think the government is not keeping us in lockdown on purpose? How is that even disputable, let alone a conspiracy theory? The government had 2 real choices. Either total China shutdown that roots out the virus, allowing people to get back to their lives, or no lockdowns Sweden/Belarus style, accepting the consequences. The current quasi kind of-not really lockdown achieves nothing but ruining the economy while keeping most avenues for the virus to spread open, ensuring endless waves of lockdowns. Please explain how that is wrong?
Harry Palmr wrote: » Only if you didn't offer a plausible, medically sound reason.
thelad95 wrote: » Behind all the conspiracy nonsense, the fact of the matter is, most world leaders are not in any way scientific minded or have any sort of medical background. Most countries had some sort of "expert advisory board" who implemented recommendations which were then half arsedly implemented or twisted to suit big industries. They are not trying to keep us in lockdown, why would they do this? To what ends? If anything most governments are trying to keep us out of lockdown, our very own government rejected a lockdown proposal a few weeks ago only to have to row back on it. A lot of European countries re-opened to tourism against medical advice as they knew it was a massive industry that needed to be serviced in some way.
spook_cook wrote: » Yeah, I've seen more and more on the rounds. The political ones usually just ally to the person's own politics, but seeing a lot of: - Melania is dead/is a double.
The_Brood wrote: » The government had 2 real choices. Either total China shutdown that roots out the virus, allowing people to get back to their lives, or no lockdowns Sweden/Belarus style, accepting the consequences.
Deleted User wrote: » ...Here's some of their promotional material. Sounds amazing, right? :rolleyes: Look into it yourself. I wouldn't be so quick dismiss publicly proposed plans like this as "nonsense" just yet...
jimgoose wrote: » As far as I can make out from that video, the plan is to turn the entire population into Millennial baristas and Deliveroo riders in Trendy Co-Living Environments.
Wibbs wrote: » That's the thing about conspiracies, they seem believable and sometimes they turn out to be true, or have a grain of truth in them. I suspect the Epstein case will be one of them. In the sense that there is a group of so called elites in positions of wealth and power that are deviants out of the box, or become deviants through boredom or greasy pole climbing and Epstein was one of the facilitators and likely(or wouldn't be a shock) groomed and placed in that position by some agent, state or otherwise for leverage purposes on his "clients"(his lifestyle, wealth and initial near immunity to prosecution don't add up). And yeah was likely killed to keep him quiet. I have the feeling we got a look behind a couple of curtains there, but it will be a brief one, swallowed up by the pandemic and other news, used as distractions and left in the box marked "conspiracy". Hell Weinstein was sexually abusing and raping women, many of them very high profile women for many years while he was being feted by the "great and good" because he was making oodles of cash while producing "worthy" blockbusters. Note how it all only came out after his star had faded. It wouldn't have come out in the 90's I'm pretty sure of that.
Hector Savage wrote: » I don't think more people are believing conspiracy theories , I think the definition of "Conspiracy theory" has become quite broad though, in order just to smear people with different political views.