unkel wrote: » How about that Glashütte on TZ?
893bet wrote: » Have look at that model before as I think it’s lovely. They wear massive IMO so that’s the killer.
unkel wrote: » You can barely get an entry level Rolex for that sort of money. Gives some perspective, doesn't it?
893bet wrote: » Last SOTC posthttps://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057397596&page=7 The Omega speedmaster professional, it had never struck a cord with me. The most overrated “meh” watch ever. I actually really like looking at pictures of speedmasters, I think they are a great watch but the way people fawn over them makes me yawn. I think the fawning is partly down to the fact they were fairly good value for the quality of the time piece
sparrowcar wrote: » "The most overrated "meh" watch ever" ... really? People fawn over them because of there history, pedigree, bang for buck and astetics. Its fair enough that its not for you but you're way off the mark with those comments IMO. Great, I feel much better now
Fitz II wrote: » At the end of the day, some people seem to really like gel with it and make it a cornerstone of their collections, some people use it as a one and done. Its a fine watch no doubt. But it would be odd to ignore the elephant in the room that a lot of collectors catch and release this one.
sparrowcar wrote: » Amazing collection 893bet and you certainly know your watches but I have to question you on this. "The most overrated "meh" watch ever" ... really? People fawn over them because of there history, pedigree, bang for buck and astetics. Its fair enough that its not for you but you're way off the mark with those comments IMO. Great, I feel much better now
Fitz II wrote: » Didnt like it and bored of it (didnt gel with it, didnt love it however you want to put it) and it occupied wrist time I wanted to alot elsewhere. Sold it. Guy I sold it to kept it 2 days before selling it on again. I have seen it for sale twice more since then. A lot of "top ten" lists and gurus suggest that any collection of worth should have a moonwatch, and maybe I was overly hyped about it, that this would bring balance to the force. I warned others on the forum that for me and a lot of people I know a moonwatch is easy come easy go, and got eaten alive. At the end of the day, some people seem to really like gel with it and make it a cornerstone of their collections, some people use it as a one and done. Its a fine watch no doubt. But it would be odd to ignore the elephant in the room that a lot of collectors catch and release this one. There are 3 for sale on adverts at the moment. That it can garner such loyality from its fans is great. People often say the Daytona is the most overrated watch, and it wear small. These are valid points.
Fitz II wrote: » Wifes are the Datejust, the Cartier, since last month the BB58 and soon probably also the Daytona.
redlead wrote: » Thats another savage collection. I'd give my left nut for the AP and JLC. I'm not really into speedies but I have to say that dark side of the moon is really really cool. Probably my next favourite there. Whats your plan when you get the snoopie? Are you going to keep the two of them? ...... just in case you are looking for a nut haha
Cyclingtourist wrote: » Cool box.
unkel wrote: » FYP :eek: Bit of a pattern there!
Fitz II wrote: » In the spirit of update season, no text sure you guys are sick of these watches at this stage. Wifes are the Datejust, the BB58 and the Cartier. Will bud hers off into a different box soon. Incoming is a Solas. On wait list for new snoopy and a skydweller. No other plans at the moment. Fancy a gold IWC chrono but it would want to be cheap. Relaxed about collecting at the moment, pleased with my collection.
Fitz II wrote: » Beautiful collection. The gold president bracelet calls to me for some reason. See lads the trick to spending stupid money on watches is to get the wife into it too.