cnocbui wrote: » Yes, under Irish law. My personal take on it is that you are only bound to obey the laws of the country you are physically present in. So while Irish law is you owe CGT for 3 years, it only applies and is relevant if you are physically in Ireland. If you are living in Singapore, it's the laws of Singapore you are obliged to follow and should follow. Ireland can pass any law it likes, why not make it you owe CGT for life? But jurisdiction ends at the border, and that's what matters. Of course none of this applies to the US, whose laws apply to everyone on the planet at all times.
stockshares wrote: » How long does it take Revenue to claim CGT once they have been notified by the Bank?
Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » (big green candle)
cnocbui wrote: » I have no idea. If I were to guess, I'd say months if not a year, because all they see is an amount deposited, only you know how much you originally paid for the asset and so whether or not a CGT has been made. For all Revenue know, that deposit could actually represent a large CGT loss. If you are asking could you get away with doing a runner, I'd say yes.
stockshares wrote: » Won't be doing a runner but I'm sorry I ever came back. How do they judge the CGT if your gain is a result of DCA over a period of time with trading occuring throughout that time and no previous withdrawals made?
cnocbui wrote: » Ha ha.
banie01 wrote: » The amount of financial data available to revenue is staggering. From card sales alone they collate the volume and value of transaction posted in the country. Revenue collate the sales data from every single pos terminal in the state via the providers. On bank transfers, banks are obliged to report any deposit over 10k or that may be suspicious. The thing is there is a huge amount of data available to Revenue on banks, deposits and spending profiling that allows them to build very rapid and very detailed financial and asset profiles on the average Joe soap who's not washing from company a to bank1 to company b to bank 2. None of their info or access is ever an issue unless and until you are pulled for an audit.
Irish_rat wrote: » All we can say is its riskier not being in crypto right now. 2021 could be some year
tcawley29 wrote: » Looks like uswap is completely gone now anyways. Website down, telegram gone, twitter gone
Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » Wasn't predictable at all :pac:
Kickstart1.3 wrote: » I wonder are we seeing Tether pumping the market, if you look at the market cap of Tether it has risen 4X in the last few months. Looking at the chart it is almost straight up since September.
FFVII wrote: » https://coingeek.com/tether-pulls-support-for-peter-mccormack-in-craig-wright-libel-case-following-discovery/
ReaLDEaL323 wrote: » i'm becoming very excited knowing CRO is gonna pump through the roof, and my buy for the card and their free 42 eur is a steal, btc also hopefully goes to mars and never looks back. anyone else jumped on CRO while it's cheap? well
el diablo wrote: » Nah, I staked MCO to receive one of their cards and it has since converted to CRO and I'm down roughly 50%. Their cards would be very tempting at current rates but I sure as hell ain't buying any more CRO.
Ryzken wrote: » Is XRP worth buying?
Whelo79 wrote: » Axion (Hex2T) has passed the Certik audit with no issues found. Full report is to be released on Wednesday I believe, along with the countdown to mainnet launch (launch scheduled for this weekend). The new website is now live www.axion.network and the price is hovering around ATH @ .0003c. This baby is poised to explode.
