nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

The wondrous adventures of Sinn Fein (part 2)

Ten of Swords

Part 1 here

All mod warnings from part 1 remain in effect

All thread bans from part 1 remain in effect

Threadbans Thread 2

Hqrry113

Carry on...

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

dundalkfc10

blanch152 wrote: »

Another one who doesn't understand the law on the mothers and baby homes. I have posted in the relevant threads about it.

I understood the DPC says what they done is illegal

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

All I did was correct christy's breathless post about doing something nobody can legally do...'spend money held in escrow'.You can't you need to get it out of escrow first.

You corrected nothing. There was money held in escrow, that the idiots in SF wanted to spend. But you are too arrogant or stupid to admit the foolishness of that, so you pathetically call me a liar to hide the blushes of SF.

You wanted to argue about the method of how that could be done.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

You corrected nothing. There was money held in escrow, that the idiots in SF wanted to spend. But you are too arrogant or stupid to admit the foolishness of that, so you pathetically call me a liar to hide the blushes of SF.

You wanted to argue about the method of how that could be done.

They, like others, wanted to spend the Apple money. That meant Ireland not partnering with Apple in an appeal. Which would have made Apple's case weaker.

I saw nothing wrong with that.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I saw nothing wrong with that.

You also saw nothing wrong with the demographics looking after themselves.

Thankfully our government made the right call despite all their other flaws.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

You also saw nothing wrong with the demographics looking after themselves.

Thankfully our government made the right call despite all their other flaws.

I never once mentioned an opinion on that christy...you lie again.

dundalkfc10

https://twitter.com/CullyRads/status/1320081783904522242?s=19

Cork City honouring the IRA. Great to see

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

.you lie again.

Absolutely pathetic, going in to semantics again. All to deflect/defend the stupidity of Sinn Fein.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

Absolutely pathetic, going in to semantics again. All to deflect/defend the stupidity of Sinn Fein.

It's 'semantic' to object to you giving me an opinion I never expressed? Up the yard lad. Please don't do that or you will get called a liar.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

It's 'semantic' to object to you giving me an opinion I never expressed? Up the yard lad. Please don't do that or you will get called a liar.

You said the demographics looking after themselves "remained to be seen". How is that not seeing nothing wrong?

Absolutely pathetic again.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

You said the demographics looking after themselves "remained to be seen". How is that not seeing nothing wrong?

Absolutely pathetic again.

That is not an opinion on it. It is the reverse of an opinion...I don't know the answer, therefore t remains to be seen. FG FF Lab all have differing views...I have no opinion on them either and it remains to be seen if they are right.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

That I don't know the answer.

Yes, so you saw nothing wrong with it and there was no lie. Pathetic.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

Yes, so you saw nothing wrong with it and there was no lie. Pathetic.

I don't know if there is anything wrong with any party's proposals on it...jesus h, christy. I have offered no opinion as it is not something high on my list of priorities.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I don't know if there is anything wrong with any party's proposals on it...jesus h, christy. I have offered no opinion as it is not something high on my list of priorities.

No need to get upset with me because you cannot see the stupidity of the demographics looking after themselves.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

No need to get upset with me because you cannot see the stupidity of the demographics looking after themselves.

I challenged you because you are lying about stuff I am supposed to have said. I have no opinion on the pension age policy of any party and haven't expressed one.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I challenged you because you are lying about stuff I am supposed to have said. I have no opinion on the pension age policy of any party and haven't expressed one.

I said you saw nothing wrong, which is true but you are still pathetically saying I am lying. All this to hide the blushes of SF?

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

I said you saw nothing wrong, which is true but you are still pathetically saying I am lying. All this to hide the blushes of SF?

I see nothing wrong with their fishery policy either because I don't know what it is.

Jaysus h. I am fully prepared to discuss what I know about. Please stop giving me opinions I never expressed.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I see nothing wrong with their fishery policy either because I don't know what it is.

Jaysus h. I am fully prepared to discuss what I know about. Please stop giving me opinions I never expressed.

Why would you comment on their brain dead pension policy if you dont know what it is? My point remains that you see nothing wrong it, and getting frustrated with me will not change that.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

Why would you comment on their brain dead pension policy if you dont know what it is? My point remains that you see nothing wrong it, and getting frustrated with me will not change that.

The second part of what I said was 'because I don't know what their pension policy'. I have added to that that I don't know the pension policy of any party, it doesn't factor in to how I vote as fishery or other policies don't.

We get it, you don't like their pension policy...find a party whose pension policy you agree with. Jaysus!

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

The second part of what I said was 'because I don't know what their pension policy'. I have added to that that I don't know the pension policy of any party, it doesn't factor in to how I vote as fishery or other policies don't.

We get it, you don't like their pension policy...find a party whose pension policy you agree with. Jaysus!

I will criticise SF's stupid pension, corporate tax and other policies when I please. If you don't know what they are then stay out of it and save us both some time.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

I will criticise SF's stupid pension, corporate tax and other policies when I please. If you don't know what they are then stay out of it and save us both some time.

You dragged me into it. Have at it but I think we all know you don't like it.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

You dragged me into it. Have at it but I think we all know you don't like it.

Yeah all my fault, pathetic.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

Yeah all my fault, pathetic.

Yes christy, when you decided to quote have of what I said as an opinion of SF's pension age policy.

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=115045958&postcount=3157

mynamejeff

Hqrry113 wrote: »

No matter what anyone says no one can deny Sinn Fein is one of the greatest parties in the history of Irish politics with Gerry Adams probably being the greatest leader in Irish history.

o Christ

Bishop of hope

MM having a pop at sf and storey funeral.
Questions again about who runs, the party?
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/sinn-f%C3%A9in-summoned-people-to-storey-funeral-to-deliver-political-message-taoiseach-1.4390581?mode=amp

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Yes christy, when you decided to quote have of what I said as an opinion of SF's pension age policy.

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=115045958&postcount=3157

You brought yourself in to the pension age issue first, go back to where you first mentioned it. You were not "dragged in", or you were lying as you might describe it.

[Deleted User]

FrancieBrady wrote: »

We get it, you don't like their pension policy...find a party whose pension policy you agree with. Jaysus!

oh is this the approach to take now, is it?

we shall all watch for it in the other govt threads, any chance you pass along to the other three or four?

because there isnt a thread on politics worth following on the board any more with the constant zero-nuance sf attacks

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

You brought yourself in to the pension age issue first, go back to where you first mentioned it. You were not "dragged in", or you were lying as you might describe it.

I have no opinion on any party's pension age plans christy. When, and if, I do I will discuss it, until then, don't subscribe opinions to me on it.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I have no opinion on any party's pension age plans christy. When, and if, I do I will discuss it, until then, don't subscribe opinions to me on it.

You commented on it before, and saw nothing wrong with it at the time.

FrancieBrady

christy c wrote: »

You commented on it before, and saw nothing wrong with it at the time.

I discussed it with you and there was a second part to what I said. I saw nothing wrong with it as I don't know much about the issue or what others were proposing. I still don't.
You fired it in again tonight because you got challenged on the escrow sensationalism you were indulging.

Not repeating myself again.

christy c

FrancieBrady wrote: »

You fired it in again tonight because you got challenged on the escrow sensationalism you were indulging.

Not repeating myself again.

Haha, escrow sensationalism. I pointed out the stupidity of gheir "plan". Which looks 10 times as stupid now with hindsight.

I fired it in again to show your pattern of stupidity.