stefanovich wrote: » It's just rhetorical nonsense. He's trying to wear you out.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » are you saying that Joe has dementia?
spook_cook wrote: » I'll be surprised if he doesn't. Either way will be fun though. Another epic breakdown like 2016 on the Dems side will be hilarious. We were assured that America would be a dictatorship by now, but hey I guess Trump decided to wait until after another election A Trump-er meltdown, ho ho. I imagine the man himself would go on an a bit twitter blowout and the fear instilled towards President Harris would be funny to see fizzle out as reality hits and things... just sorta stay the same.
OS_Head wrote: » Yep, Here's are his own Democratic party attacking him on this very issue at the beginning of the year. He should be allowed to retire. Is this not elder abuse?
Deleted User wrote: » This line of argument is really failing after he's done multiple town halls and two debates...
ohnonotgmail wrote: » no confusion on my part. I'm an old codger but Rudy is a LOT older than me. somebody that looks 20 is a young girl. It is really creepy that rudy thinks it is appropriate to have a quick fiddle while alone with her.
OS_Head wrote: » Call them town halls? He puts a lid on his campaign most days by 9am. Doctors can prescribe special pickups to help through a couple of hours. That's why he wouldn't do a drug test. The town halls are not real town halls either. Only soft ball questions asked, run by activist network hosts and scripted questions by "undecided voters" who are actually former employees and associates. Much like the "What flavour of Ice Cream" question he got when the laptop scandal broke. The "reporters" are there to protect him. Only softball questions asked. Reporters that ask anything else are vilified and canceled on twitter. The first debate was against the Biden apologist moderator Chris Wallace. No wonder Trumps approach. The debate last night, Trump clearly won. Biden just gave a lot of sound bites. They almost seemed like he had them memorized. He had very little by way of detail.
MadYaker wrote: » So you say he has dementia in one post and now you’re saying he memorised answers for the debate. Not the brightest eh? I guess these are the only people left supporting trump now. Sad!
John Divney wrote: » Do you honestly not think Biden is in a rapid cognitive decline? All politics aside, you think he’s not on the outs mentally?
spook_cook wrote: » I'm reading this as you do think there's something up with Joe. I'm sure I won't be the only one to do so.
Jimmy Bottlehead wrote: » Have you heard Trump speak? At least Biden has a higher position to decline from. Trump has the intelligence and emotional maturity of a toddler.
MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: » A man fit for the rocking chair and a newspaper, is trouncing Donnie by nearly double digits..
OS_Head wrote: » The funny thing is you believe in the polls. What were the polls the last time. 98.5% chance that Clinton was going to win. Well that worked out well. Believe the polls at your own peril.
John Divney wrote: » Yes Trump speaks in a very simplistic way. He also speaks of the cuff for hours and has the energy of a freak for a man his age. .
John Divney wrote: » You’d have to be deluded or just partisan to deny he’s going downhill rapidly.
MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: » Thing about the polls they showed in 16 that things were changing in Donnie's favour after the first debate..
spook_cook wrote: » If Biden loses, will he get the same blame as Hillary when she famously refused to campaign in certain swing states. In fairness I think she just wasn't arsed and thought it was in the bag though.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » She was 87% at peak according to the 538 model, and only for a relatively brief period. She was a ~70% favourite on the day of the election haven floated as a ~55 - 60% favourite for much of the summer. Biden has held a strong advantage for months; early voting is underway in record numbers; polling landscape is crucially different in that it indicates there are way less undecided available to Trump to close the gap late when compared to 2016. But look - the above is fundamentally all the Trump fans have left. Hoping that the polls are systemically wrong and Trump can also close the margin. Because he needs *both* to happen in the last 10 days.
partyguinness wrote: » A cold chill swept my body at 3am this morning during the debate. It is the same chill I experienced a few days before the Brexit vote and Trump in 2016. Trump will win.
John Divney wrote: » Bidens camp doesn’t even believe the polls
John Divney wrote: » The accurate polls from 2016 have it as a margin of error race, that’s means a Trump win in enough swing states. The early voting is good at the moment for Republicans and so is voter registration
OS_Head wrote: » And look how drastically wrong they got it in 2016. The polls, run mostly by leftist organisations, have been wrong in a lot of western countries in the last decade. It is certainly a trend. It's more like the Dems are hoping the polls are systematically right which they have not been. Plus you have to acknowledge the silent majority that is claimed by the right. A lot of people are afraid to publicly proclaim their support for Trump and thus will do so in a private polling station. Getting them out to vote is crucial though.