Zardoz wrote: » I spoke with a friend of mine at the weekend, she is a manager in a hospital . She said that the Garda vetting process for new nurses can take months and there was some other cruelty to patients training to be passed too. Red tape galore.
cantalach wrote: » Surely grown-ups should be allowed to decide for themselves if it is safe to go into the park after dark?
Icantthinkof1 wrote: » I couldn’t see the council agreeing to keeping public parks open later as it would encourage gatherings and anti social behaviour. I wouldn’t walk in any park in the city in the dark
Chuck Noland wrote: » Council staff who open and close the parks can often be alone when doing so. I wouldn’t like to walk in/drive into a park alone at night and potentially have to tell a group your locking the gates
jackrussel wrote: » So they've made a second entrance to that site on south Douglas road and now have canopy’s between the containers. Safe to say it will be a test site?
Total number of positive cases of COVID-19 identified in CUH in the past 24 hours = 1 · Total number of inpatient cases of COVID-19 currently in CUH = 29 · Total number of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 discharged from CUH in the last 24 hours = 1 · Total number of COVID-19 patients receiving ventilator support in CUH = 1 Dr. Gerard O’Callaghan, Interim Chief Executive Officer .
Pen Rua wrote: » I would agreed that the walkway I raised it not exactly the safest (plenty of places for people to gather / hide etc) so I can see why it's locked after dark. However, it still leaves a lot of us city dwellers without any pleasant amenity for a walk in the evening within 5km for this Lockdown 2.0
ACitizenErased wrote: » 98 today
JP Liz V1 wrote: » It is rising everywhere city and county
Cork Lass wrote: » 41 in Cork today
Be right back wrote: » Great to see low numbers..
SleetAndSnow wrote: » Great numbers, over 200 difference in the swabs though so I'm excepting a bigger number to come soon
ACitizenErased wrote: » 200 swabs across 26 counties. I highly doubt this number is off.
Vinnie222 wrote: » Numbers lower due to the problems with the track and trace system?