bozzer198 wrote: » same with winding up and examinership , but i dont have restriction
awsah wrote: » Restriction is a handy topic and it comes up regularly. It can come up with winding up if the question refers to a quai partnership type company and there has been a breakdown, if one of the members feels they are being restricted they can have the company wound up as was the case in Re Murphs Restaurant....would be a lovely question if you had time to look over it
fLawless123 wrote: » Is there anybody else who have no exams scheduled when they successfully logged on to Better Examinations? A bit worried given the mock exam is supposed to happen at 10am tomorrow
mariussulla1977 wrote: » Is there a possibility of postponing the exam till March? Have a newborn baby in the house so no hope of getting the quiet time for an exam at home.
legallyginger wrote: » What is peoples opinions on length of answers for the typed exam? I know its quality over quantity but if it was written I would be aiming for 3.5-4 pages...hard to judge that when you are typing no?
LawStudent96 wrote: » Wondering about this too, I would have thought a typed answer would usually be shorter in page length than a written one so I presume it will just balance out. It might look shorter but realistically if the quality is there it shouldn't matter. I do type fairly quickly though and I'm a bit worried that I'll finish the exam too soon and start overthinking the length or quality of answers.
tommytimber wrote: » Does anyone have a copy of March 2020 Company Paper or know what was on it?
FE1student560 wrote: » Did we get confirmation on whether our eye movements will be monitored by AI while sitting the exam? I'm not that fussed, but I'd prefer to sit the exam without a further worry on my mind like whether Skynet will report me for looking out of the window.
jus_me wrote: » What are people focusing on for Tort- any advice appreciated
channing90 wrote: » Constitutional There are 28 chapters in my Manuel and there’s no way I can cover more than 14, Would it be wise to leave out topics that haven’t come up in ages like freedom of association, abortion, right to silence, right to a jury trial, personal liberty. Just wondering had anyone any thoughts.
lawDani wrote: » sorry guys, has anybody else's link expired and is anybody else still waiting on the LS to solve the issue of not logging in? this mock exam is less than 20 hours away and , radio silence... im not even doing criminal but i have never sat exams (even held meetings) online.. i miss the basics..
Lawlaw12 wrote: » Try logging in here:https://lawsocietyie.betterexaminations.com/
lawDani wrote: » so i just learned OPW does not supply EU Leg.. any suggestions welcomed x
Angela21 wrote: » Constitutional is a nightmare. Prob best not to leave out liberty and Freedom. If u wanted to cut maybe you could focus on medical treatment for liberty and privacy and good name for assocation Right to fair trial is a large topic and rarely comes up you could take a chance . But it has come up twice in the past. Skipping anything in Constitutional is chance because his questions are so difficult. Defo do not leave out separation, equality interpretation, LS, property equality and fundamental rights. But that is still a lot to cover.. I would reduce cases and know the principles if I go stuck for time.
Iso_123 wrote: » This has slightly freaked me out because I have left out equality and liberty! i have covered a lot of the other chapters though I have 15-16 out of the 21 chapters in my manual covered so im hoping that's enough? I genuinely don't think my brain could handle any more info if im being honest:( I left out equality, liberty, unenumerated rights doctine (although I did cover privacy), decs of invalidity/remedies and right to life/the unborn does anyone think i am mad leaving these out if i have pretty much everything else covered?
