SporadicMan wrote: » This new DP stuff is.. insanity. We're literally paying for people to come into the country and get priority over our own people. I am so ****ing sick of feeling like a second class citizen in what is supposed to be my 'home'. This is quite literally opening the borders and making Irish people pay for it. Better get ready lads, once this news gets out we'll be seeing a huge influx of people into the country who resent the population already there.
TomTomTim wrote: » The worst part is when you become numb to the madness, because you don't see it changing anytime soon. None of the main parties will dare dissent, and none of the fringe parties are credible, so I'd struggle to vote for them, which leaves us with little hope. The fact that the people making these decisions would gladly have open borders in the purest sense, to me, is a great conflict of interests. It's an outright farce, and completely undemocratic. At this stage, I don't think it's one bit dramatic to call this nation a banana republic.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » How are we going to find these new houses for asylum seekers in the middle of a housing crisis?
Patrick2010 wrote: » Assume they will go to the top of the local housing list once granted asylum? Helen McEntee avoiding the question of how feasible it is to move them into own door accommodation given a housing shortage, she’s on newstalk now
endacl wrote: » Hard to imagine a dish that can’t be improved by adding a dash of spice. Good thing.
MidlanderMan wrote: » The fact that on the same stree in Athlone I can get authentic thai food for lunch and fantastic lebanese food for dinner and then walk 200 metres and get a Byriani the next day is amazing. Or that within spitting distace of eachother I can get brilliant Japanese food in a tiny cafe and then traditional Xi'anese hand pulled Biang Biang noodles in Galway. Or within 30 seconds of eachother on Capel Street in dublin I can get Ramen, Pho, or Bibimbap. Beats the **** out of the bad Italian and Chinese food we grew up withm that's for sure.
Deleted User wrote: » All of which is great, but how much interaction do you have with the families who own/run those places? Not much is my guess. So, the extent of multiculturalism is having access to food and not much else. At least, not unless the numbers of migrants who arrive increases significantly, and even then, in most cases, those cultural/national groups are very clannish, limiting their interactions with Irish people.
SporadicMan wrote: » Where's the Irish food places?
Deleted User wrote: » The government has more money to spend that the average buyer dealing with a mortgage. Ahh that bottomless hole of debt. So convenient. There are many houses/apartments throughout the country that could be purchased but the prices are beyond most people (for all manner of reasons.. and would become available to Irish people if taxes/charges were lowered, but that won't happen). I know of two fine properties in my area which the owners would love to sell, but the State charges make any sale to be far beyond the means of the vast majority of Irish people. Our politicians naturally have no appreciation for the money they spend so, they'll simply buy up and give the asylum seekers those properties. I wouldn't be surprised if we see some of the historical properties which are protected or under conservation to also be allocated perhaps as 'hotels' for families.
Kivaro wrote: We really need a political party and Irish politicians to stand up and ask hard hitting questions about these ludicrous demands in the NGO report.
MidlanderMan wrote: » Know the family who own the Thai place personally, as well as a few staff members. Have had coffee and chats with the Lebanese lads more than once, and the Longford based owners of the indian place are good friends of a good friend of mine so I've met them at a few parties. Know of an Indian lad in Tullamore who does free meals for people who are low on money and opens every day on christmas day to feed people who live alone or are living in emergency accomodation, or just need a meal. These families send their kids to our schools, the play sports with yours and my kids, their kids are as Irish as I am.
Wibbs wrote: » The one hope here is that immigration won't just be an urban, specifically sink estate urban phenomenon, because that's were the faultlines tend to become deep. Depends on the source of migration too. East Asians and Indians for example tend to not cluster at the bottom of the society, even tend to be clustered near the top. We see this in the UK and it's got little to do with "race". EG British Indians do far better on average than British Pakistanis. Same "race". Not religion either. Muslim East Asians and Arabs again do better than Muslim Pakistanis.
Geuze wrote: » There is no need for any non-EU immigration, other than where very specific labour market skills are not available here. I don't know why it's even being discussed.
statesaver wrote: » Vive La Francehttps://twitter.com/TomlinsonCJ/status/1318989819050156034
Deleted User wrote: » Agreed.Even before Covid, it's worth considering the range of unemployment in countries like Italy, Spain etc, It boggles my mind as to why we're being pushed so hard to accept non-western nationalities. It's almost as if we're not supposed to help other Europeans while being part of the EU... The logic just makes no sense. If we need labor, then we can easily get it from other European or western nations. There is a labor pool out there who are not drastically different from us, and who would have the side effect of better relationships with the countries most able to help us later.
Deleted User wrote: » Even before Covid, it's worth considering the range of unemployment in countries like Italy, Spain etc, It boggles my mind as to why we're being pushed so hard to accept non-western nationalities. It's almost as if we're not supposed to help other Europeans while being part of the EU...
As a country we pride ourselves on being Ireland of the welcomes
[Deleted User] wrote: » The amnesty that the Day paper proposes of giving leave to remain to anyone 2 years in direct provision is nuts, people there that long have already had their claim assessed and found to be lacking. Surely it would just leave them open to cases from the small amount who were deported but had been at some point in DP for more than 2 years. It makes a mockery of the system. This report seems to be a wish list by activists and makes no concrete suggestions about how the process should be sped up. Its exactly the type of thing to make the public turn on welcoming genuine asylum seekers.
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/ireland-can-and-must-do-much-better-for-asylum-seekers-1.4387238 This author seems quite deluded to put it mildly.