lawDani wrote: » I JUST WENT ON TO THEIR SITE; I DONT KNOW WHY ITS NOT COMING AS A LINK HERE BUT THATS COPIED FROM MY SEARCH BAR - sorry for shouting..
Lawlaw12 wrote: » I'm worried about this too, there's nothing we can do if it happens to cut-out mid-exam
Wonderstruck wrote: » If you're having trouble writing a link you can write like Wonderstruck[at]domainname[dot].ie or if that doesnt work pm me and i can drop it in here, I have a ten year old account and you only have one post so I presume I am old enough I can post links
Hazel774 wrote: » Where are you getting instant fail from?
lawDani wrote: » haha! SAME! and i got on to the web team in LS and they cant fix it as 'it didn't come from them' im going to loose my mind. i emailed BetterExaminations.... its a JOKE
moeby wrote: » Which email did you use to contact BetterExaminations? I tried calling them and the woman on the other line told me they are called "TerminalFour". I mentioned I was sitting online exams with BetterExaminations and I was having trouble logging in and I was told I must have called the wrong number as she hadn't heard of them. I got the details off of BetterExaminations . com Unfortunately, the forum wont allow me to post the link here. Any contact details for this crowd would be much appreciated! Thanks
rightytighty wrote: » Did anyone hear back about judicial assistant? Getting ridiculous now
Jeremiah25 wrote: » Has anyone else's sign up link expired? Just tried to set up my password for the first time and got that. Problems already
Aoibhin511 wrote: » Pick 2 of the following: i. Shatter v. Guerin [2019] IESC 9. ii. McCrystal v. Minister for Children [2012] IESC 53. iii. M v. Minister for Justice and Equality [2018] IESC 14. iv. DPP v. JC [2015] IESC 31. Its even more random than for EU from what I can see, only 2 cases have ever come up more than once. But unlike EU they tend to be more recent cases, so if you're up to date you could get lucky
rickmatt wrote: » Hi anyone have the March 2020 Constitutional Exam Paper? Or even just the Casenote Q? Is the casenote question for Constitutional similar to the EU one? i.e. pure random and not worth studying? Or is it much more doable?
Lallers96 wrote: » I was fine with a typed exam but it's a dealbreaker with the potential instant fail if I move my eyes away from the screen. I always look up and around me when I'm thinking and also ill have to look at my legislation. Every decision they make they continue to lower my opinion of the law society.
awsah wrote: » I spoke to LS about this as there is a lot of construction going on in my area and the electricity can be intermittent, all she said was that there had been a lot of calls about people saying they were worried about sharing wifi with housemates/ construction in area etc. She said this was all new to them as well and they were figuring things out. I understand that this is all new to them, everyone know that, but why do they have to figure things out two weeks before we are due to sit the exam
Hazel774 wrote: » Has anyone got an answer about what will happen if our wifi goes during the exam? I have strong wifi in my house, but it's unfortunately been cutting out a lot over the last few weeks so I don't know what I'm going to do if it goes during the exam. Obviously we have no control over whether or not there will be an issue with our wifi during that 3 hour period, so I feel that we should be advised in advance on what to do if that happens. We can't be expected to stop mid-answer and start trying to deal with tech issues, we will totally lose our train of thought. I've emailed about it, but (unsurprisingly) they haven't responded
illy.m wrote: » Anyone else considering not sitting this typed exam? I haven't done much typing for the past 6 months, and I need a pen and paper to plan my answer. This is just how my brain works. I feel that sitting the exam this time under the current rules will affect my grade. Did someone on here say that the LS will try to arrange some other sitting or did I dream about that?
lsheehaneire wrote: » Hi guys , just wondering if anyone is legal support staff and if your working through level 5 restrictions?