HotDudeLife wrote: » I like how selective you are in choosing 2024 (in an attempt to undermine my contribution to this thread) when my post stated late 2022 and 2023/24. Newsflash, there is not much time between late 2022 and 2023. May i ask how exactly are you a mod? All you seem to do is try embarrass and vilify posters who expect property prices to drop.
JimmyVik wrote: » I would like to officially push out my prediction of a major property price drop to Jan 2022 from my previous one of Jan 2021. If it hasnt happened by then, make it Jan 2023. I'll be right in the end. I always am.
Balluba wrote: » I see that the Daft Report/ Oct is published this morning
fliball123 wrote: » http://www.msn.com/en-ie/money/news/house-prices-rise-5percent-as-supply-falls-to-lowest-in-over-a-decade/ar-BB1aa3Za?li=BBr5KbJ&ocid=iehp wow and here was me being ridiculed continuously over stating that supply is dwindling all the time and that this would impact price as night is dark and day is light both statements are true as is supply vs demand = price ... So the theories of housing follows the economy ...when did the ecconomy go up by 5% in the last 2 years???? I have said that this time it is different then 2008 the comparisons on here to that crash have been laughable. Add in that Pfizer are hopefully close to getting clearence for a vaccine by next month the doomsayers will be pissing in their cornflakes this morninghttps://www.rte.ie/news/business/2020/1016/1172037-pfizer-could-file-for-vaccine-clearance-next-month/
KennisWhale wrote: » It's meaningless data - the volume of transactions is less than half of what it was last year for the same period. Remember, we have not had the covid economic fallout yet as governments are still propping it all up. The economic fallout won't come until restrictions are eased, then a few months later we will see the impact on the property market. Any commentary on the state of the market because of covid, right now, is irrelevant (whether someone says everything is fine or not).
Balluba wrote: » Are you assuming that the Irish public will have confidence in a vaccine that was fast tracked through safety tests?
fliball123 wrote: » Well it will be well tested by then sure if you look at history any vaccine has been resisted going back to the likes of the Polio vaccine, apparently Elvis had to be hired to get people taking it. It may take a while a year or 2 but I think if people have to continue living under lockdown rules I reckon the majority will risk it in order to get back to living a normal life
Balluba wrote: » I’m sure Meghan and Harry can be hired this time to persuade us to take it
fago wrote: » I think it's almost impossible to read anything into asking prices, in my view.myhome price changes taking a random sampling of 5 pages has 75% reductions, 25% up. I don't know how to square that against the daft report, the source data should be the same. And then there's also the fiddling that goes on such as a property taken down at 750 and reposted at 685. If 685 is above the current median asking price is that an increase, or because its a relisting is it marked as a decrease? Only 2 things are reliable - you're properly interested in a place, you ring an auctioneer and they tell you the current offer and go from there against your budget/interest, or look at the PPR
Marius34 wrote: » wrong. the volume of transactions is around 30% lower, and recovering.
lalababa wrote: » The unfortunate trend especially in Ireland is of ever increasing house prices relative to wages. This trend is very worrying, and should be reversed. €”
KennisWhale wrote: » Not wrong at all. There has been a 40% fall off in transactions in August, which followed (by comparison to the same months in 2019) 40.7% lower in July, 53.6% lower in June, 46% lower in May and 29% lower in April.
Deleted User wrote: » We aren't stuck for land in Ireland. There is no reason we cant build enough houses for our small population. It's a failure of policy.
fago wrote: » I think it's almost impossible to read anything into asking prices, in my view. myhome price changes taking a random sampling of 5 pages has 75% reductions, 25% up. I don't know how to square that against the daft report, the source data should be the same. And then there's also the fiddling that goes on such as a property taken down at 750 and reposted at 685. If 685 is above the current median asking price is that an increase, or because its a relisting is it marked as a decrease? Only 2 things are reliable - you're properly interested in a place, you ring an auctioneer and they tell you the current offer and go from there against your budget/interest, or look at the PPR
cnocbui wrote: » Is it a failure of policy or is that just the way it is in big cities?
PropQueries wrote: » Some news on the potential impact of WFH on the commercial property market in the UK: "Deloitte is planning to close four of its 50 UK offices in the coming months as the coronavirus pandemic has forced the accounting group to cut costs and remote working has reduced its need for expensive property leases."
PropQueries wrote: » I would say it's a failure of policy, or a success of policy depending on ones view of the Government's misuse of the land they own within the cities. For example, David McWilliams wrote an article recently where he stated: "Cathal Brugha Barracks in Rathmines is perfect for development. It constitutes 42 acres of residential land. The Defence Forces alone maintain some 20,000 acres in total across the state for training purposes – surely less valuable land can be made available in a swap with the Army?" Why does the army require 42 acres in Rathmines? It couldn't be more central. How many high density social housing units could be built on that site alone? A properly designed social housing development there would probably solve all problems within 2 years. Link to David McWilliams article here: http://www.davidmcwilliams.ie/why-an-irish-mortgage-costs-e80k-more-than-a-german-one/
GreeBo wrote: » ok, but follow that idea through. Build housing on every square inch of land in Dublin, at *some* point you have no more land and yet in an increasing population you still have demand....now what? It's always going to be supply vs demand and with housing, increasing supply actually increases the demand as the units get cheaper so more people want them.Its not possible to solve this, no where has.
Coyler wrote: » So follow your logic the other way then, what's the point of building anything because the demand will always be met?