AlphaDelta1 wrote: » Think it's going to be an interesting couple of weeks. Lots of twists and turns. Election will be a lot closer than many seem to think.
Billy Mays wrote: » Donnie's very own coronavirus adviser has a tweet removed by twitter because...wait for it...it contained misinformation regarding coronavirus What a time to be alive folks
Eric Cartman wrote: » twitter deciding what information the public are allowed see from one Side of a two party race and acting US government staff being censored, what a time indeed
blueskys wrote: » Trump is gone, the wind has changed at the wrong time for him. I think he'll lose by 7-8 points.
Billy Mays wrote: » Are you not concerned that the US president's very own coronavirus adviser is spreading misinformation about coronavirus? I mean that's pretty f*cked up like. Do you not think so?
Overheal wrote: » How dare private companies exercise their 1st amendment rights :mad:
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » We are dealing with idiocracy now. Ordinarily nutcases like Rudi wouldn't be anywhere near the levers of power. This is a dumbed down world now where effing idiots get to decide who is in charge. The consequences of putting unfit people in positions of power you only get away with for so long. Eventually the insanity filters down in to real world consequences. It's a consequence of the retarding of education, the retarding of critical thinking skills, and the rise of social media/biased tv that places these people in our societies in bubbles of conspiracy theory, derangement, debasement, and outright lies. Science and experts are ignored and ridiculed. It's extremely alarming for the future. Carl Sagan in one of his books predicted all this before his death with frightening accuracy. Can't think off the top of my head which one it was.
Eric Cartman wrote: » but what misinformation are we talking about here, I doubt they were blaming the jews or chemtrails. Theres a lot of debate about what is the best information for covid , there are advisors who will disagree, doesn't make it misinformation, but twitter have decided what they believe on it and everything else is false.
cnocbui wrote: » You belive someone who handles stolen goods?
Deleted User wrote: » He claimed masks don't work. This is absolutely untrue and is misinformation. It's incredibly irresponsible and further encourages idiots to not wear masks. It's a pretty disturbing sign of his knowledge on the subject and it's far from a political attack to remove such idiocy.
patnor1011 wrote: » It is a stage every decaying empire go through. The world just got smaller so more people see it. Welcome to the USA. The best democracy money can buy.
Luxxis wrote: » private companies do not have 1st amendment rights. They are protected by section 203 of the comms act. 1996. But that may be about to end. If Twitter/Facebook edit what users see that makes them publishers. And thus lose their protection. Think of it like a book store. If the store just sells books they wont be held liable for anything in the books only the publishers will be, But if the book stores start editing the books, they are now publishers and thus liable. Trump is setting out legalisation on this.
Phoebas wrote: » They are not editing the book in your analogy - they are simply deciding not to stock it.
patnor1011 wrote: » If the laptop is real (it seems to be) then it is not stolen. It became the property of the repair shop after service ordered was not paid for.
Isaac eventually reported his possession of the laptop to the FBI at some point in 2019. The FBI took possession of the device through a federal subpoena, but because Isaac had legal rights as the possessor of the device, he made a hard drive backup of the laptop’s contents. He then took the information from the laptop to Utah Senator Mike Lee and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani reported the contents to the New York Post, which led to the recent bombshell report on its contents.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » You only support their biased moderation because it impacts those whose political views you don't align yourself with. If conservatives bought the company and suddenly started treating refusing to allow the posting of links from the NYT and WaPo, you'd be doing a 180 quick smart. You're not fooling anyone with this pretense that your position is based on your respect for the US Constitution either. Sure we see how little regard you have for it on other threads.
Deleted User wrote: » It's not a political view that the post was removed for.. it was misinformation on safe practises during a pandemic. It really shows the stupidity that has taken off, trying to politicize mask wearing during a pandemic...
schmittel wrote: » I don't think Outlaw Pete is talking about politicizing mask wearing?!
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
