Five Eighth wrote: » Maybe it's using the same creative accounting that was used in the film 'The Producers' - film the worst sitcom you can create and take out insurance against it flopping. Beginning to make sense.
jill_valentine wrote: » If you didn't see much of it then...? Eh, either way, missed out tbh. Catastrophe is some of the best Irish or British writing in recent memory. Can ye imagine how different Irish tv could be if RTE were giving people with Horgan's kind of talent a reason to stay rather than paying their otherwise completely unhireable human wallpaper presenters half a million a year?
Elmo wrote: » It's alright RTÉ has moved over to Dept of Media now, hope you were not assigned to the Post and Telegraphs division.
gazzer wrote: » I felt nauseous paying my renewal of my licence fee today. Funding the likes of this ****e. I wouldn't have paid it only I work for the Dept of Communications
ButtersSuki wrote: » You’re seriously underestimating the fees involved in a tv series if you think an appearance is €10k. Opening a Supermac’s in Ballinasloe will net you €20K+. An appearance would be approx €50k, then there’s repeat fees (and we know RTÉ will be repeating this every year until 2040 and beyond), and he’ll get fees if it’s sold on to other stations and countries - prob unlikely in this case.
Muahahaha wrote: » I wonder what Neil Morriseys 10 second cameo cost last week, would guess he is not going to do it for any less than 10k + hotel and flight costs. Absolutely pointless having him in there as staff in Supermacs except for Huberman doing a friend a favour. He must have been laughing his head off straight down to the bank.
Muahahaha wrote: » I saw the credits at the end of last nights episode and it had around 70 or 80 people working on making it. Plus it said "Supported by RTE and the Government of Ireland through tax concessions" which I presume is that Section 481 Film tax credit which allows investors in fils and tv programs write off 32% of their costs against tax. Must say Im flabberghasted that investors actually invested in this tripe, I dont think they'll be seeing much of a profit out of this one.
walshb wrote: » Can you just imagine poor owl BOD fake laughing to it and spoofing the fooking head off Amy telling her how it’s actually quite good..
ligerdub wrote: » It isn't profit dependent as far as I understand. The benefit is known when you put your money in (open to correction on that).
[Deleted User] wrote: » until she met BOD though she was a bit part character at best in the few things she was in. Her career would have ultimately died off even with her RTE connections. Her brother acts as well. Another brutally wooden actor
saabsaab wrote: » 'Catastrophe', apt name. Didn't see much of it. Mean woman meets nice guy get pregnant, that's it. Not my thing surprised it did as well as it did.
They really should change the name to F...
Elmo wrote: » so they can sell it to the English, UKTV seem to pick up this kind of stuff. In fairness it was clearly signaled as a very very light, and Huberman isn't the worst actress and in this very light comedy drama she's joining the dots, don't expect much. Also Huberman has forged a career for herself, she has been on nearly every single Sunday Night drama on RTÉ since the demise of Glenroe (20 fing years nearly), long before she met BOD, On Home Ground, The Clinic, Striking Out, surprised she didn't get a role in Raw or Love/Hate.
Five Eighth wrote: » Having read the posts and then a review by Liam Fay in last weekends Sunday Times in which he states:"...This insufferably smug and witless ball of giddy fluff...What we're supposed to find hilarious, it seems, is the incongruous spectacle of a famously stylish celebrity like Huberman getting gussied up in garb that her look daft or dowdy...Joy is essentially a walking checklist of chick-flick cliché." My question is why would anyone waste a minute of their time of this earth to watch such crap? Surely, people after watching some or all of series one would have had a very good idea of what to expect?