Bishop of hope wrote: » Try the three letter abbreviation ending in A. No, not the IRA, go again.
Truthvader wrote: » Leaving aside the Bobby Storey funeral as the cause (just speculation) ; is it true thT the rate is 6 times higher in nationalist areas. ?? If that is established , why is that the case??
UDAWINNER wrote: » https://twitter.com/DarranMarshall/status/1317151841843544065 Bigoted statement, but then he will have people who will defend him. Sickening
McMurphy wrote: » Lol welcome back,
Kowerski wrote: » Sorry but I can't think of any reason why I would need to post on a forum at 4 in morning about Sinn Fein or any poltical party. Maybe if the conversation was ongoing but the previous post was 5 hours before.
McMurphy wrote: » There's a million and one reasons why someone would be up at 4am, and only one of them would be solely "to post something about Sinn Fein" on a messaging board. The rest of your post makes absolutely zero sense tbh, it is a discussion forum, arguing what?
Kowerski wrote: » But getting up at 4 in morning to post something about Sinn Fein is totally reasonable behavior?
I thought this was a discussion forum? why would they be arguing?
McMurphy wrote: » There was a few instances of people running multiple accounts, (that's called sock puppeting), we had one lad on here who, after getting banned went full on right on, and actually turned up in drag arguing the exact same points, in the exact same style in the exact same forums. It was fcukin hilarious to watch though, him trying to pretend he was a lady.
Kowerski wrote: » Seems to be a lot of accusations of bots/working for parties etc on here. Do political parties actually have people working on boards?
Kowerski wrote: » You got up at 4 in the morning to post this onto boards, why?
dundalkfc10 wrote: » Another good good for Sinn Féin political wise The shambles is getting worse by the week, Another day thinking they know better than the experts
Colonel Claptrap wrote: » I seem to remember bright orange jackets and a very visible election campaign. Are we talking about the same politican?https://twitter.com/MurphyEoghan/status/1218523483220647936?s=20
FrancieBrady wrote: » Maybe ask FG about him..they literally locked him away for the election campaign with Simon Harris. Their PR gurus will have all the data you want.
imme wrote: » Thanks for dealing with that Francie. Enjoy your evening.
Colonel Claptrap wrote: » Was he though? When elected in 2011 he received 5,783 first preference votes in the now abolished Dublin South-East constituency. A turnout of 35,000. In 2020 he received 6,346 votes in the new, very crowded Dublin Bay south constituency with a turnout of 40,000. This time up against heavy hitters like Jim O'Callaghan and Eamon Ryan. He also carried a strong running mate in Kate O'Connell who split the FG vote. Chris Andrews pipped him to the second seat in this 4 seater thanks to transfers, resulting in Murphy taking the third seat. He was not at risk of losing his seat. Considering the drop off in FG support around the country, i think he did quite well for himself all things considered.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Comical Ali levels reached there, no harm to you.
imme wrote: » In the olden days a punishment squad would be sent around to Nphet to sort them out and stop them from making people into worriers. Are people worrying, who is worrying, is there data on this.
jm08 wrote: » Eoghan Murphy was punished for his sins at the last election by his constituents for a poor performance. He was lucky to retain his seat.
FrancieBrady wrote: » There is zero need for NPHET to be issuing recommendations until they meet with government...an then one single coherent message issued. It is ridiculous at this stage that people are sitting worrying about what level we will be at and gives the impression that government is dithering and chaotic.
imme wrote: » What is wrong, why would people be doing this. Nphet gives advice and the government decides. The basic thing is that people should be responsible. I see that Mary Lou Mcdonald and Pierce Doherty were responsible in their comments this week on the level of personal responsibility that people need to take.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Well maybe we shouldn't be stridently told that the medical advice has to be adhered to then. Again people will have to sit worrying the weekend because we know what NPHET are recommending and the government take their sweet time to get together to decide. Why can't this all be done in-house. Sit down with NPHET - discuss - then issue the communique? It's not rocket science and is clear and concise governing,
Nobotty wrote: » I don't think thats looking at the situation in the round If we had a nphet for heart disease and level 5 was everyone under 30 run 10k, eat avocado and restrict calories to 1200 for as long as it takes,whilst closing pubs and fining smokers,would it fly either? Heart disease kills around 10,000 in Ireland every year There's elements of realism needed and thankfully every party bar the anarchists have it IMO
FrancieBrady wrote: » Kelly wants to ignore the medical advice too so.
Topgear on Dave wrote: » Talking about workers right and raising the PUP. However Kelly was asked what level the restrictions should be. He's backing them to go for level four and to try to keep the school's open. Good interview.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Dude, you change your mind on these things about as 10 times a day. You live in one the wealthiest, fairest and most equitable countries in the world. Billions would love to have even a 10th of the support and opportunities you and me have. Context is what you need.
Idbatterim wrote: » people say" imagine SF running a country" I have seen what two booms endless money and over two decades of FFG gets. and its pathetic! Happy to see what SF do, cant be any worse... happy to see the greens kept in power, might see some rail infrastructure built, instead of a decimated capital budget decimated to fund obscene welfare etc...
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/23af546224513cf852af4d456d68d01c.svg)
