Aoibhin511 wrote: » Yep I emailed them with screenshots
Aoibhin511 wrote: » No, but it's barely been an hour, I wont get mad at them just yet
Hiya1234 wrote: » Can I ask what people are covering for Contract?
StabiloLaw wrote: » I did this question and mentioned a number of things. Nervous Shock of Fred - that it needed to be foreseeable and proven by a medical practitioner, and proven that it was caused by the event. Brought in Negligence to show it was foreseeable. Mentioned Trespass to the person and said Sally verbally assaulted Fred unknowingly, causing him emotional distress to the point where he got physically sick (Kelly Principle requirement to show a real and describable illness). Brought in Vicarious Liability for Harrison here as he should have seen Fred was likely to believe the situation, and Sally was working in the scope of her employment. Finished off with saying that Harrison breached his duty of care towards the individuals on his set but barely touched on this. Not sure how well I did in the particular question, but I got a high pass in Tort overall and at the time, felt this was one of my better questions.
Aoibhin511 wrote: » Yeah, but the website says if you didn't get it the two reasons are that you're not registered or you email address is wrong. Which is not the case for for me and the previous poster, and possibly many others
Lawlaw12 wrote: » Oh sorry I didn't see that on the website, my bad! I am registered and my email address is correct too so I'm in the same boat as you guys then
Lozg wrote: » Can I ask which topics came up in the online tort paper please?
FE1_2020_ wrote: » What are people covering for Equity ? I have the following covered but feel like its not enough: - Trustees 'Duties' - Charitable Trusts & Cy-Pres - Quia timet & Mandatory Interlocutory injunctions (Mareva omitted - appeared last March) - Estoppel - Undue Influence - Specific Performance - Rectification - Secret Trusts - Strong v Bird - DMC I am considering adding in Joint accounts & presumption of advancement but not sure. I feel like the above could be enough to hopefully pull five q's from the 8 on the day.
JayFE1 wrote: » Yeah, sounds good to me. I posted the other day about equity and PoA & Joint A/Cs and Constructive Trusts were topics that skipped my mind. I would do PoA and Joint A/Cs if you’re considering an extra topic. Secrets Trusts is a fascinating topic alright and it’s something I was on for Uni but not in the FE1s. I’m not saying it doesn’t come up but IMO there’s more value in spending the time elsewhere. You’ve probably already done your notes and learning it off now though. Strong v Bird is something I’d be on too but IIRC it’s asked as a 10 marker 2 outta 3 style question so IMO if you’re going to commit to it then look at the past papers and see what topics usually come up with it - The only one I can remember off the top of my head is satisfaction but there will be others. On Marevas, it’s something that was highly likely for March considering the previous two sittings and the popularity of it. It did come up but that’s not to say it won’t come up for you next month. Out of the three injunction topics, it has the highest probable value although that is reduced now by Marchs appearance. Just something to consider if you don’t want an extra topic but to maximise the chances of an existing one appearing. Best of luck for the exam pal!
Samuma wrote: » I still couldn't get through to the number. They said they would provide all details today and they still haven't done that. They need to let us know what's going on. Wonder is it time for 1850 715 815? Don't suppose anyone is very good at guessing and can predict what will be on the Constitution paper??? Or what topics you're going to chance leaving out? In theory, how many cases should we be using for essay questions (working on the assumption that I use the right cases for the right topics in the first place!!). I welcome advice or feedback from anyone who has passed it in the past
maggie95 wrote: » This would have been a far less stressful way to have dealt with this entire situation: - Take a shot every time the Law Society hangs up on you - Take a shot every time the Law Society transfers your call to at least two different people - Take a gulp every time the Law Society gives you information but it's incredibly vague and leaves you with even more questions - Take a shot every time the Law Society's FE1 helpline rings out - Down your drink for every time you've found out something from Boards before the Law Society had the decency to email or update website but instead update one person over phone - Take a shot every time each of your exams is postponed - Just take a massive drink every time you regret starting these bloody exams - Also one which is particularly relevant for today, cheers and down your drink when the Law Society give a date to provide more information but unsurprisingly do not
MrT_98 wrote: » Guys I'm just wondering, are Bayer orders on the syllabus for Equity FE1?
jus_me wrote: » Interested in predictions for constitutional too!!!
sunnylegal wrote: » Anyone have a list of Equity topics they are studying?
FE1new wrote: » Injunctions (Mareva came up in March but I'm leaving it in with all the others). Express Trusts (3 certainties, DMC and Strong v Bird - usually in 2 of 3) Charitable Trusts and Cy Pres Resulting Trusts (PoA, Joint A/C) Recission (including undue influence) Estoppel Trustees Tracing Specific Performance I hope I'll get 5Qs out of that and that i will remember it for the exam.
sunnylegal wrote: » Thanks a mill for these. If I studied all of these would I pass?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/1c2638d40c8423fc1a2b2b1a2a01a3b9.svg)
