onedmc wrote: » So Bullethq has just sent me an email to say that their Free-Forever package is no longer free. No warning - bang - you have to pay to have access to you accounts. Anyone else think that that is DISHONEST I did get an email to say that they were updating their free pricing but no mention that it would not longer be free or that I would now have to pay to have access to MY historical account information. I'm kinda stunned at this sort of behaviour from a company that you are supposed to trust with your accounts information.
in2dark wrote: » Totally dishonest! Agree with you... Im using my own local server and running invoiceninja. Totally free and not sharing my clients info anymore with the smarty bullet...
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » Invoice Ninja is a great system - but Bullet was handy for all the other stuff inc VAT returns, but I see this is exclusive to the top-tier package now. I wish they had another package in between the €15 and €28 but there seems to be no demand for it. I can find very little chatter about bullet on-line apart from their own forum which is most likely censored anyway. Maybe they don't have that many clients and so have to squeeze them now to make ends meet?
in2dark wrote: » Dont find it hard to do my own vat returns to be honest every 2 months.... I also do my vies once a month
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » Yes VAT returns are easy enough, but it was a nice touch to Bullet. Have you ever looked at GnuCash? It seems to be well supported and has a setup for small business accounts. I think I'm going to give it a whirl. I've looked at two other self-hosted solutions, Front Accounting and WebZash but both seemed quite hard to use.
vintagecosmos wrote: » I noticed the forums and social media is heavily censored. Owner seems to be a a bit stuck up. Made a dope of himself on twitter when someone suggested doing more in Irish. Amazing how many 5 star reviews they have from people with only one review.... Anyway. As you can tell. I'm not a fan.
vintagecosmos wrote: » Have heard some horror stories around bullet and accountants charging a packet to start from scratch and do up accounts. (Although probably the fault of peoples input) regardless, You just can't trust a legal compliance matter to such a small venture.
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » LOL yes I found them to be quite arrogant. Bullet would not accept new dates when my VAT reporting changed. They insisted that I had to talk to revenue as no-one else had the problem, but in fact I figured it out myself that their implementation was a bit quirky and got it entered. When I alerted them to the "problem" I was ignored. Another time they replied that display problems in the browser was the fault of my computer.
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » They introduced me to one of their recommended accountants who could help out as he was familiar with the Bullet system - trouble was he was four times more expensive than the competition.
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » Can anyone clarify another point? - Bullet told me "it's tax deductible, so it comes out of your tax not your profit, and so is in effect free". My accountant says that this is incorrect and the Bullet fees will come off your taxable profits before /U] tax is calculated. So the saving is actually 12.5%, not 100% or "free".
Royale with Cheese wrote: » I got emails about pricing changes but quickly scanning them was told their €7 package wasn't increasing price so I thought grand. First of the month rolls round and I try to create an invoice... nope that'll cost you €15 a month now. More than double the price.
vintagecosmos wrote: » That's hilarious. They must think you are thick. As an example, So if you spend 100k on business stationery it's a business expense so you won't pay corporation tax on it so therefore it's free? Where is the 100k gone then
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » I assume their point is that the 100k has been paid by the state in lost CT effectively subsidising your stationery.
vintagecosmos wrote: » it is a peculiar marketing message. Like if you cant convince them, confuse them. They would have been better to say "here is why we are good value bla bla bla..."
seamus wrote: » The "free, forever" thing was probably done in good faith. But as companies so often discover, when you give away the milk for free, nobody will buy the dairy cows that you're selling. It's a common mistake I've seen with a lot of software startups. Where it would have made more sense to have usage limits that encouraged people to sign up without binding themselves into a "free forever" agreement. At some point it was likely decided that the bad PR from shutting down free accounts was worth the cost savings/income that it would yield.
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » Yes agreed - I'm sure the business model was born out of naivety rather than anything else.
ObiTwoKenobi wrote: » naivety
onedmc wrote: » Closer to stupidity. When I saw bullet was free forever, I simply though that's a bit stupid when you could have said "free for five years".
vintagecosmos wrote: » Wave is free, but they have a sustainable model in partnership with Stripe i.e. they charge standard rates to the client for online payments, but get a percentage from Stripe.
meijin wrote: » 3rd time you're suggesting Wave here... do you work for them?