nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

[Deleted User]

She's permanently on twitter now tweeting links to wacky stories from a few years ago and every single conspiracy theory she can get her hands on

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Nexytus

Biker79 wrote: »

I also support protesting against masks. Reminds me that we live in a country where not everyone is a mindless automaton.

Would you advise people to wear masks while protesting?

freshpopcorn

Biker79 wrote: »

I also support protesting against masks. Reminds me that we live in a country where not everyone is a mindless automaton.

So, you support loads of people travelling to one location without masks making people feel uncomfortable, putting people lives at risk and putting pressure on the health service, Gardai, etc.

Biker79

OSI wrote: »

Find me a single law that provides a person of LGBTQI+ (I've no idea what the latest acronym is) more legal protections than any other social group.

Exactly.

And who cares if religious people disagree with their lifestyles.

Who cares if atheists don't like religious people? So what.

Nobody likes woke lefties though. Which is fair enough.

[Deleted User]

Biker79 wrote: »

Exactly.

And who cares if religious people disagree with their lifestyles.

Who cares if atheists don't like religious people? So what.

Nobody likes woke lefties though. Which is fair enough.

Are you able to make coherent points? Religious people are free to hold beliefs about gay people. (Not a lifestyle btw) The issue arises when they attempt to limit their rights.

Deebles McBeebles

Is the opposite of a woke leftie, a sleeping rightie?

Penfailed

Biker79 wrote: »

Even LGBTQ people ( who enjoy some of the greatest legal protections of any social group ) ..think Gay Pride is an embarrassment.

And it is.

Are you sure about that? I've a few gay friends who love the Pride events.

munster87

I know some bikers in their 40s that love the parades. Don’t see a problem.

[Deleted User]

Biker79 wrote: »

Fair play to her....at least someone has the courage to protest against the gradual erosion of personal freedoms.

Can you explain perhaps how fixing the pavement outside the graveyard is a 'gradual erosion of personal freedoms'?

Biker79 wrote: »

Even LGBTQ people ( who enjoy some of the greatest legal protections of any social group ) ..think Gay Pride is an embarrassment.

Who exactly do you think organises and participates in Pride events?

ohnonotgmail

munster87 wrote: »

I know some bikers in their 40s that love the parades. Don’t see a problem.

that took me a minute. I must be having one of my slow days

Eric Cartman

The Nal wrote: »

Thats not true.

You obviously didnt watch the clip. Its more her opinions on gay people in general. "Its not natural, its not what God wants".

Hahaha. Its 2020 FFS.

its really making me think she's pandering to her funding, never used to be on about the aul christianity, then over the last year or so god has become the great moral authority a few times...

Rothko

I don't know why you all keep replying to that user. He's clearly just here to wind people up.

OldGoat

Rothko wrote: »

I don't know why you all keep replying to that user. He's clearly just here to wind people up.

Altruism. We know that posters playing devils advocate get pleasure from provoking others and so we feed Biker's endorphin rush by responding to their posts.

The Nal

Eric Cartman wrote: »

its really making me think she's pandering to her funding, never used to be on about the aul christianity, then over the last year or so god has become the great moral authority a few times...

Its probably a smart move and the only one she has left. Pandering to religious Nationalist types. They do have a history of donating.

Eric Cartman

The Nal wrote: »

Its probably a smart move and the only one she has left. Pandering to religious Nationalist types. They do have a history of donating.

Thats it, she’ll get a few stateside donors from the jesus crowd, expect a few videos of the house done up and the theme will be abortion and how its ‘baby murder’ .

TaurenDruid

OSI wrote: »

The problem you have is that little snippets like his that are just thrown out need rebuttals and fact checking. If they're just left there then the more casual observers will see opinions that might not be that far from half formed yet to be validated opinions of their own, and rather than seeing them challenged and hopefully leading them to challenging their own, they'll just see unanswered questions which fuels their need for validation further.

So, to be clear, a moderator is telling us, explicitly, to feed the trolls?

LollipopJimmy

When are the legal fees that herself Johnny owe to the state due?

They've gone quiet on that, I wonder have they been paid.

Biker79

AndrewJRenko wrote: »

Can you explain perhaps how fixing the pavement outside the graveyard is a 'gradual erosion of personal freedoms'?

Who exactly do you think organises and participates in Pride events?

Renko - it'll be a cold day in hell before I engage with you and your Bolshevism.

Better off saving your energy for the revolution.

Biker79

TaurenDruid wrote: »

So, to be clear, a moderator is telling us, explicitly, to feed the trolls?

Surely if you had some legs to stand on, you wouldn't resort to calling people names?

TaurenDruid

Biker79 wrote: »

Surely if you had some legs to stand on, you wouldn't resort to calling people names?

I'd say the person without legs to stand on is - just possibly - the one who has had their points challenged or completely rebutted, and who then fails to respond further to those posts.

Biker79

TaurenDruid wrote: »

I'd say the person without legs to stand on is - just possibly - the one who has had their points challenged or completely rebutted, and who then fails to respond further to those posts.

None of my points have been rebutted.

Like I said - juvenile sarcasm is not a an argument.

Beasty

TaurenDruid wrote: »

So, to be clear, a moderator is telling us, explicitly, to feed the trolls?

OSI is not a moderator of this forum

Do not respond to this post in-thread

Beasty

Biker79 wrote: »

Exactly.

And who cares if religious people disagree with their lifestyles.

Who cares if atheists don't like religious people? So what.

Nobody likes woke lefties though. Which is fair enough.

Biker79 wrote: »

Renko - it'll be a cold day in hell before I engage with you and your Bolshevism.

Better off saving your energy for the revolution.

Biker79 wrote: »

None of my points have been rebutted.

Like I said - juvenile sarcasm is not a an argument.

Threadbanned

Seth Brundle

aan now, it's because I watch Netflix?

https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1314112752592527362

[Deleted User]

Seth Brundle wrote: »

aan now, it's because I watch Netflix?

https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1314112752592527362

Who would have thought farmers were having so much fun.

ancapailldorcha

Seth Brundle wrote: »

aan now, it's because I watch Netflix?

https://twitter.com/aciquestion/status/1314112752592527362

Yes... Netflix.

Anyone else notice the Madeleine McCann book?

TheRepentent

ancapailldorcha wrote: »

Yes... Netflix.

Anyone else notice the Madeleine McCann book?

yep...creepy b1tch

And the picture from her Mary Boyle book as well...she has been stirring sh1t up over that case too for years

whippet

So I'm watching too much porn now .....

Seth Brundle

TheRepentent wrote: »

yep...creepy b1tch

And the picture from her Mary Boyle book as well...she has been stirring sh1t up over that case too for years

If I recall correctly, those in the Boyle family that were looking for justice quickly didn't want Gems near that case.

ancapailldorcha

TheRepentent wrote: »

yep...creepy b1tch

And the picture from her Mary Boyle book as well...she has been stirring sh1t up over that case too for years

That's just vile, frankly.

freshpopcorn

Well Gemma has John and John has Gemma so they don’t need Porn!