Fe1student1234 wrote: » The August online ones were written and you had to scan your paper to them If these go ahead I’d say it will be typed due to the amount of students
Dliodoir2021 wrote: » Does anyone know if you type the online exams or write them?
Dliodoir2021 wrote: » Number of decades*** Ruined a lot of peoples twenties, etc. I wish I was exaggerating but I'm not.
Lallers96 wrote: » I'd love to see an article hit the news about this because we have been well and truly f*cked about for 7 months now.
Ianmc97 wrote: » anyone else find it curious that the law society posted in here for the first time only an hour or 2 after a journalist posted that they were interested on doing a story about the issues with the FE1s......... maybe my tinfoil hat is on too tight.
Law20213 wrote: » would it not be prejudice to allow one person to pass over another just because one person is closer to finishing the exams than the other...like what if your half way through them
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » I would be in favour of awarding exemptions to students (maybe leaning towards those who are close enough to finishing all eight) who have had their sittings messed around on them now three times in a row. We can't just indefinitely press pause on our lives while this virus ravages society when so many things could be done ahead of time to make life easier for everyone involved.
rebuke wrote: » It is quite ironic to see the Law Societies press release today in relation to mental health week considering the amount of unwarranted stress they have subjected FE1 students to over the last number of months
sh_owens wrote: » Maybe we should all take collective action as a student body and pen a letter to the President of the Law Society mentioning our concerns. A lot of the concerns noted by users above are undoubtedly valid and should be communicated to the Law Society for them to consider it. Would anyone be interested in getting involved to draft a letter we could send this week? Or does anyone have any contacts in the Law Society we could send this letter to? I have sent numerous emails over the last few weeks and I'm aware most candidates have too which have just been ignored. Does anyone have any other ideas? It seems like collective action as a group might be the only option to communicate our concerns and highlight the unfair treatment us as candidates have received during these unprecedented times.
Law20213 wrote: » Ironic I know but they do chime in here now and again particular when exams results are released and the system crashes regularly
Fe1student1234 wrote: » I was pretty sure they were - could be wrong haha How else do they give out the numbers ?
Law20213 wrote: » I don’t think the exam numbers are in direct correlation to the number of people sitting the exams
Lawlaw12 wrote: » I sat one sitting before the rule change and my exam number was over 1500, so if exam numbers are related to numbers sitting then it seems there was more than 500 or so
Aoibhin511 wrote: » Yes! This is what I've been thinking. I know they didn't know the pandemic was going to happen when they changed they rules but like why don't they just change them back for this year at least
Fe1student1234 wrote: » I didn’t realize it went up that much tbh like there was 1000 sitting each exam in August or so! I’m not really focused on the training contract aspect right now haha I just didn’t realize that usually there’s only like 500 per exam before these rule changes I couldn’t imagine sitting the FE1s whilst in college
Law20213 wrote: » It would actually there’s anything from 500-600 students sitting exams prior to the changes in the fe1 rules and there’s certainly not the same number of training contracts on the market Since but I’m speaking from grads position so
Fe1student1234 wrote: » I’m not sure that would even reduce the numbers by a significant amount - how many college students are actually sitting them Like either way there’s a good few hundred per exam My exam number for both sittings so far have been 2000 and over